Boehm Felix, Graesslin Rene, Theodoraki Marie-Nicole, Schild Leon, Greve Jens, Hoffmann Thomas K, Schuler Patrick J
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ulm University Medical Center, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Surgical Oncology Ulm, i2SOUL Consortium, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Mar 19;13(6):1398. doi: 10.3390/cancers13061398.
In the past few years, surgical robots have recently entered the medical field, particularly in urology, gynecology, and general surgery. However, the clinical effectiveness and safety of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in the field of head and neck surgery has not been clearly established. In this review, we evaluate to what extent RAS can potentially be applied in head and neck surgery, in which fields it is already daily routine and what advantages can be seen in comparison to conventional surgery. For this purpose, we conducted a systematic review of trials published between 2000 and 2021, as well as currently ongoing trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov. The results were structured according to anatomical regions, for the topics "Costs," "current clinical trials," and "robotic research" we added separate sections for the sake of clarity. Our findings show a lack of large-scale systematic randomized trials on the use of robots in head and neck surgery. Most studies include small case series or lack a control arm which enables a comparison with established standard procedures. The question of financial reimbursement is still not answered and the systems on the market still require some specific improvements for the use in head and neck surgery.
在过去几年中,手术机器人最近进入了医学领域,尤其是在泌尿外科、妇科和普通外科。然而,机器人辅助手术(RAS)在头颈外科领域的临床有效性和安全性尚未明确确立。在本综述中,我们评估了RAS在头颈外科中潜在的应用程度、哪些领域已成为日常常规操作以及与传统手术相比有哪些优势。为此,我们对2000年至2021年间发表的试验以及在clinicaltrials.gov上注册的正在进行的试验进行了系统综述。结果根据解剖区域进行了整理,为了清晰起见,对于“成本”“当前临床试验”和“机器人研究”等主题,我们增加了单独的章节。我们的研究结果表明,在头颈外科中使用机器人缺乏大规模的系统随机试验。大多数研究包括小病例系列或缺乏对照组,无法与既定的标准程序进行比较。财务报销问题仍未得到解答,市场上的系统在用于头颈外科时仍需要一些具体改进。