Department of Industry and System Engineering, Turkish Military Academy, Ankara, Turkey.
Department of Healthcare Management, Başkent University, Center for Strategy and Technology, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1178-1188. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3164. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
Prolonging non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) used in the control of pandemics can cause a devastating effect on the overall economic and social welfare levels. Therefore, policymakers are facing a difficult duty in terms of implementing economically and socially sustainable and acceptable measures. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of NPIs implemented to control the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, eight NPI measures were analysed, and their effects on the number of cases were investigated for France, Spain, China, and South Korea. In the study, the treatment effect of these mechanisms on the daily increase rate of the total number of cases during a certain period was analysed by using logarithmic linear regression with a dummy variables model. The findings indicate that the measures are effective against the spread of the pandemic at different levels. The findings also suggest that the most effective measure in decreasing the number of cases is workplace closure. An analysis comparing the effectiveness of countrywide measures and regional measures shows that school closing is the most effective measure to decrease the number of cases when implemented countrywide as opposed to regional implementation.
延长用于大流行控制的非药物干预措施(NPIs)可能对整体经济和社会福利水平造成毁灭性影响。因此,政策制定者在实施经济和社会可持续且可接受的措施方面面临艰巨的任务。本研究旨在调查为控制 COVID-19 大流行而实施的 NPIs 的有效性。为此,分析了八项 NPI 措施,并针对法国、西班牙、中国和韩国,研究了这些措施对病例数量的影响。在该研究中,通过使用带有虚拟变量模型的对数线性回归,分析了这些机制在特定时期内总病例数每日增长率方面的治疗效果。研究结果表明,这些措施在不同层面上对大流行的传播具有抑制作用。研究结果还表明,减少病例数量最有效的措施是关闭工作场所。对全国性措施和区域性措施有效性的比较分析表明,与区域性实施相比,全国范围内实施学校关闭是减少病例数量最有效的措施。