Suppr超能文献

非药物干预措施对 COVID-19 的影响:跨国分析。

Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19: A cross-country analysis.

机构信息

Department of Industry and System Engineering, Turkish Military Academy, Ankara, Turkey.

Department of Healthcare Management, Başkent University, Center for Strategy and Technology, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1178-1188. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3164. Epub 2021 Apr 5.

Abstract

Prolonging non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) used in the control of pandemics can cause a devastating effect on the overall economic and social welfare levels. Therefore, policymakers are facing a difficult duty in terms of implementing economically and socially sustainable and acceptable measures. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of NPIs implemented to control the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, eight NPI measures were analysed, and their effects on the number of cases were investigated for France, Spain, China, and South Korea. In the study, the treatment effect of these mechanisms on the daily increase rate of the total number of cases during a certain period was analysed by using logarithmic linear regression with a dummy variables model. The findings indicate that the measures are effective against the spread of the pandemic at different levels. The findings also suggest that the most effective measure in decreasing the number of cases is workplace closure. An analysis comparing the effectiveness of countrywide measures and regional measures shows that school closing is the most effective measure to decrease the number of cases when implemented countrywide as opposed to regional implementation.

摘要

延长用于大流行控制的非药物干预措施(NPIs)可能对整体经济和社会福利水平造成毁灭性影响。因此,政策制定者在实施经济和社会可持续且可接受的措施方面面临艰巨的任务。本研究旨在调查为控制 COVID-19 大流行而实施的 NPIs 的有效性。为此,分析了八项 NPI 措施,并针对法国、西班牙、中国和韩国,研究了这些措施对病例数量的影响。在该研究中,通过使用带有虚拟变量模型的对数线性回归,分析了这些机制在特定时期内总病例数每日增长率方面的治疗效果。研究结果表明,这些措施在不同层面上对大流行的传播具有抑制作用。研究结果还表明,减少病例数量最有效的措施是关闭工作场所。对全国性措施和区域性措施有效性的比较分析表明,与区域性实施相比,全国范围内实施学校关闭是减少病例数量最有效的措施。

相似文献

1
Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19: A cross-country analysis.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2021 Jul;36(4):1178-1188. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3164. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
2
Assessing mandatory stay-at-home and business closure effects on the spread of COVID-19.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2021 Apr;51(4):e13484. doi: 10.1111/eci.13484. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
4
Public mobility data enables COVID-19 forecasting and management at local and global scales.
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 29;11(1):13531. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92892-8.
5
Clinical effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19 on other nationally notifiable infectious diseases in South Korea.
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(5):823-832. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.501. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
7
Understanding South Korea's Response to the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Real-Time Analysis.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 21;17(24):9571. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249571.
9
Effect of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions and the Implications for Human Rights.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 30;18(1):217. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18010217.

引用本文的文献

2
Clinical effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19 on other nationally notifiable infectious diseases in South Korea.
Korean J Intern Med. 2024 Sep;39(5):823-832. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.501. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
4
Policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in West Africa: a scoping review protocol.
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 10;13(12):e079810. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079810.
5
Effectiveness of social distancing measures and lockdowns for reducing transmission of COVID-19 in non-healthcare, community-based settings.
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2023 Oct 9;381(2257):20230132. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2023.0132. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
10
Spatiotemporal impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 on the incidence of infectious diarrhea in Xi'an, China.
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;10:1011592. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1011592. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
A Time-Dependent SIR Model for COVID-19 With Undetectable Infected Persons.
IEEE Trans Netw Sci Eng. 2020 Sep 18;7(4):3279-3294. doi: 10.1109/TNSE.2020.3024723. eCollection 2020 Oct 1.
2
Human mobility restrictions and the spread of the Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in China.
J Public Econ. 2020 Nov;191:104272. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104272. Epub 2020 Sep 8.
4
Adoption and impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19.
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Apr 2;5:59. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15808.1. eCollection 2020.
5
Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e375-e385. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30133-X. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
6
Social network-based distancing strategies to flatten the COVID-19 curve in a post-lockdown world.
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):588-596. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0898-6. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
7
Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China.
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):410-413. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Mathematical assessment of the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions on curtailing the 2019 novel Coronavirus.
Math Biosci. 2020 Jul;325:108364. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108364. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
Impact assessment of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease 2019 and influenza in Hong Kong: an observational study.
Lancet Public Health. 2020 May;5(5):e279-e288. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30090-6. Epub 2020 Apr 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验