T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.
Department of Community Health Sciences, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Contraception. 2021 Aug;104(2):132-138. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.028. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
To measure the agreement between women's current contraceptive use and her preferred method, as well as her partner's preferred method.
We used the fourth wave of survey data (2017-2018) from the Umoyo wa Thanzi (UTHA) cohort study of sexual and reproductive health decision making. The prevalence of concordance between women's current method and her preferred method was calculated (n = 818). Among partnered women, we calculated prevalence of concordance between women's current method and her partner's preferred method (n = 719). We used multivariate logistic regression analyses to assess the relationship between women's characteristics and the outcomes.
Despite high prevalence of modern contraceptive use (74.4%), many women were using methods that did not match their preferences (62.6%) or those of their partners (62.3%). Fifty-five percent of women with preference-use discordance preferred methods that were more effective than theirs. Satisfaction with current family planning choice (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], > 5.5 each) and pregnancy desires (aOR, >1.5 each) were strong predictors of both concordance between women's current method and her preferred method and her partner's preferred method. Women who reported higher sexual frequency in past month had elevated odds of concordance between her current and preferred method (aOR: 1.97 for 9+times in past months) than women who had not had sex.
Many Malawian women are not using methods they or their partners prefer. Women desiring pregnancy, women reporting infrequent sex, and women who are not satisfied with their method are likely to prefer a different method than the one they are currently using.
Understanding women's preferences can assist with family planning service provision. Health care providers and researchers should consider the specific methods that women and their partners prefer to use, besides whether they are using any method.
衡量女性当前避孕方法与她首选方法以及她伴侣首选方法之间的一致性。
我们使用性与生殖健康决策 Umoyo wa Thanzi(UTHA)队列研究的第四波调查数据(2017-2018 年)。计算了女性当前方法与首选方法一致的流行率(n=818)。在有伴侣的女性中,我们计算了女性当前方法与伴侣首选方法一致的流行率(n=719)。我们使用多变量逻辑回归分析评估女性特征与结果之间的关系。
尽管现代避孕方法的使用率很高(74.4%),但许多女性使用的方法与其首选方法(62.6%)或其伴侣首选方法(62.3%)不匹配。55%的首选方法与实际方法不一致的女性,其首选方法的效果优于其实际方法。对当前计划生育选择的满意度(调整优势比[OR],均>5.5)和怀孕愿望(OR,均>1.5)是女性当前方法与首选方法以及伴侣首选方法一致的强烈预测因素。过去一个月报告较高性频率的女性,其当前方法与首选方法一致的可能性高于没有性生活的女性(过去一个月有 9 次及以上性行为的女性 OR:1.97)。
许多马拉维女性没有使用她们或她们的伴侣首选的方法。希望怀孕的女性、报告性频率低的女性和对方法不满意的女性,她们可能更倾向于使用与当前使用方法不同的方法。
了解女性的偏好可以帮助提供计划生育服务。医疗保健提供者和研究人员应该考虑女性及其伴侣首选使用的具体方法,而不仅仅是他们是否正在使用任何方法。