Beal S L, McKennan M
Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento 95817.
Arch Surg. 1988 Jul;123(7):828-32. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400310042007.
A review of our past year's trauma experience revealed that we admitted an average of three patients per month with blunt diaphragm rupture, a total of 39 ruptures in 37 patients. Twenty patients (54%) presented to the emergency room in shock. Thirty patients (81%) required urgent airway intervention. All but one patient had associated injuries. Diaphragm rupture is difficult to diagnose; it was not initially recognized in 69% of cases. Chest roentgenogram was often nondiagnostic. Peritoneal lavage gave false-negative results. We ultimately failed to diagnose diaphragm rupture in only three cases. We attributed our low incidence of missed injury to an aggressive approach in the severely injured patient population, where exploratory laparotomy is a routine part of the complete evaluation. One third of the ruptures were on the right side. The complication rate was 82%, excluding a mortality rate of 40.5%. High morbidity and mortality were related primarily to associated injuries.
回顾我们过去一年的创伤治疗经验发现,我们平均每月收治3例钝性膈肌破裂患者,37例患者共发生39处破裂。20例患者(54%)因休克被送往急诊室。30例患者(81%)需要紧急气道干预。除1例患者外,所有患者均伴有其他损伤。膈肌破裂难以诊断;69%的病例最初未被识别。胸部X线检查通常无法确诊。腹腔灌洗结果常为假阴性。我们最终仅在3例病例中未能诊断出膈肌破裂。我们将漏诊率低归因于对重伤患者采取的积极治疗方法,在这类患者中,剖腹探查术是全面评估的常规组成部分。三分之一的破裂发生在右侧。并发症发生率为82%,死亡率为40.5%。高发病率和死亡率主要与相关损伤有关。