Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
Radiation Oncology, Pathology and Urology, and Institute of Onco-Physics, Montefiore Hospital and Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Apr;9(4). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-002038.
Recent evidence indicates that ionizing radiation can enhance immune responses to tumors. Advances in radiation delivery techniques allow hypofractionated delivery of conformal radiotherapy. Hypofractionation or other modifications of standard fractionation may improve radiation's ability to promote immune responses to tumors. Other novel delivery options may also affect immune responses, including T-cell activation and tumor-antigen presentation changes. However, there is limited understanding of the immunological impact of hypofractionated and unique multifractionated radiotherapy regimens, as these observations are relatively recent. Hence, these differences in radiotherapy fractionation result in distinct immune-modulatory effects. Radiation oncologists and immunologists convened a virtual consensus discussion to identify current deficiencies, challenges, pitfalls and critical gaps when combining radiotherapy with immunotherapy and making recommendations to the field and advise National Cancer Institute on new directions and initiatives that will help further development of these two fields.This commentary aims to raise the awareness of this complexity so that the need to study radiation dose, fractionation, type and volume is understood and valued by the immuno-oncology research community. Divergence of approaches and findings between preclinical studies and clinical trials highlights the need for evaluating the design of future clinical studies with particular emphasis on radiation dose and fractionation, immune biomarkers and selecting appropriate end points for combination radiation/immune modulator trials, recognizing that direct effect on the tumor and potential abscopal effect may well be different. Similarly, preclinical studies should be designed as much as possible to model the intended clinical setting. This article describes a conceptual framework for testing different radiation therapy regimens as separate models of how radiation itself functions as an immunomodulatory 'drug' to provide alternatives to the widely adopted 'one-size-fits-all' strategy of frequently used 8 Gy×3 regimens immunomodulation.
最近的证据表明,电离辐射可以增强肿瘤的免疫反应。放射治疗技术的进步允许适形放疗的分割剂量减少。分割剂量减少或标准分割剂量的其他修改可能会提高放射治疗促进肿瘤免疫反应的能力。其他新的传递选择也可能影响免疫反应,包括 T 细胞激活和肿瘤抗原呈递变化。然而,对于分割剂量减少和独特的多次分割放疗方案的免疫影响的理解有限,因为这些观察结果相对较新。因此,放疗分割剂量的这些差异导致了不同的免疫调节作用。放射肿瘤学家和免疫学家召开了一次虚拟共识讨论,以确定将放射治疗与免疫治疗相结合时当前的缺陷、挑战、陷阱和关键差距,并向该领域提出建议,并向国家癌症研究所提供新的方向和举措,以帮助这两个领域的进一步发展。本评论旨在提高对这种复杂性的认识,以便使免疫肿瘤学研究界理解和重视研究放射剂量、分割剂量、类型和体积的必要性。临床前研究和临床试验之间方法和结果的分歧突出表明,需要评估未来临床研究的设计,特别是强调放射剂量和分割剂量、免疫生物标志物和选择适当的终点,以进行联合放射/免疫调节剂试验,认识到直接作用于肿瘤和潜在的远隔效应可能大不相同。同样,临床前研究应尽可能设计成模拟预期的临床环境。本文描述了一个概念框架,用于测试不同的放射治疗方案,作为放射本身作为免疫调节“药物”发挥作用的单独模型,为广泛采用的 8 Gy×3 方案免疫调节的“一刀切”策略提供替代方案。