Suppr超能文献

知情同意的现代史及关键信息的作用

A Modern History of Informed Consent and the Role of Key Information.

作者信息

Bazzano Lydia A, Durant Jaquail, Brantley Paula Rhode

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA.

The University of Queensland Faculty of Medicine, Ochsner Clinical School, New Orleans, LA.

出版信息

Ochsner J. 2021 Spring;21(1):81-85. doi: 10.31486/toj.19.0105.

Abstract

The concept of informed consent has evolved significantly with regard to both the practice of medicine and research conducted with human volunteers. Yet the process of informed consent used in clinical research and the lengthy consent documents that are difficult to comprehend have been criticized. We review the history of informed consent as a legal and regulatory concept and the intended impact of the new key information section, a requirement that was introduced in the 2017 revisions to the Common Rule. The key information section is intended to be a concise and focused presentation at the beginning of the informed consent document that facilitates potential participants' comprehension of the research. However, the lack of regulatory guidance regarding content and length has been problematic. To avoid the risk of noncompliance, many institutions have sought safe harbor by following the limited format guidelines included in the preamble to the revisions to the Common Rule. Research examining formats for the key information section and aids to increasing potential participants' understanding of a research project should be conducted to ensure that the new regulations achieve the original intent rather than simply lengthening an already lengthy paper document. In addition, the human research protections community should evaluate whether the key information section increases research participants' understanding of what they will be undertaking in a particular study.

摘要

在医学实践以及针对人类志愿者开展的研究方面,知情同意的概念已经有了显著演变。然而,临床研究中使用的知情同意流程以及那些难以理解的冗长同意文件一直受到批评。我们回顾了知情同意作为一个法律和监管概念的历史,以及新的关键信息部分的预期影响,这一要求是在2017年对《共同规则》的修订中引入的。关键信息部分旨在在知情同意文件开头进行简洁且重点突出的呈现,以促进潜在参与者对研究的理解。然而,在内容和长度方面缺乏监管指导一直是个问题。为避免违规风险,许多机构通过遵循《共同规则》修订版前言中包含的有限格式指南来寻求安全港。应该开展研究,考察关键信息部分的格式以及有助于提高潜在参与者对研究项目理解的辅助手段,以确保新规定实现其初衷,而不是仅仅让原本冗长的纸质文件变得更长。此外,人体研究保护界应该评估关键信息部分是否增强了研究参与者对他们在特定研究中将要从事的事情的理解。

相似文献

5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
9
Understanding Broad Consent.理解广泛同意。
Ochsner J. 2020 Spring;20(1):81-86. doi: 10.31486/toj.19.0088.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验