Suppr超能文献

乳腺癌:定量双层光谱 CT 与腋窝超声在腋窝转移性淋巴结术前诊断中的对比。

Breast cancer: comparison of quantitative dual-layer spectral CT and axillary ultrasonography for preoperative diagnosis of metastatic axillary lymph nodes.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

Department of Plastic and Breast Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 35, 8200, Aarhus N, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Radiol Exp. 2021 Apr 9;5(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s41747-021-00212-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to compare the diagnostic performance of quantitative dual-layer spectral computed tomography (DLSCT) and axillary ultrasound (US) for diagnosing lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients.

METHODS

DLSCT and axillary US were prospectively performed in 70 needle biopsy-verified breast cancer patients. Histopathology and imaging data were available for evaluation in 36 axillae from 34 patients. In each patient, ipsilateral, contralateral, and inguinal lymph nodes (LNs) were semiautomatically segmented, and iodine density, spectral slope, Z effective, virtual non-contrast (VNC), conventional CT HU values, and Δ contrast enhancement (ΔCE, conventional CT HU minus VNC) were measured. Using histopathology as reference, the diagnostic performance of DLSCT and axillary US was compared.

RESULTS

Of 36 axillae, 23 had metastatic lymph nodes. Compared with non-metastatic LNs, metastatic LNs had significantly different iodine density (p = 0.021), spectral slope (p < 0.001), Z effective (p < 0.001), conventional CT HU values (p < 0.01), and ΔCE (p < 0.01). All DLSCT parameters were significantly different between arterial phase and portal-venous phase (p < 0.001) except for VNC (p = 0.092). ΔCE had the highest diagnostic performance (sensitivity 0.79, specificity 0.92, positive predictive value 0.95, negative predictive value 0.69) with a significantly increased sensitivity compared with conventional CT HU (p = 0.027). There were no significant differences between ΔCE and axillary US for sensitivity (p = 1.000) or specificity (p = 0.320).

CONCLUSIONS

DLSCT is a promising quantitative technique for evaluating LN metastases and could potentially reduce the need for sentinel LN biopsy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较定量双能光谱 CT(DLSCT)与腋窝超声(US)在诊断乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移中的诊断性能。

方法

对 70 例经穿刺活检证实的乳腺癌患者进行前瞻性 DLSCT 和腋窝 US 检查。34 例患者的 36 个腋窝中有组织病理学和影像学数据可供评估。在每个患者中,对同侧、对侧和腹股沟淋巴结(LNs)进行半自动分割,并测量碘密度、光谱斜率、Z 有效、虚拟非对比(VNC)、常规 CT HU 值和Δ对比增强(ΔCE,常规 CT HU 减去 VNC)。以组织病理学为参考,比较 DLSCT 和腋窝 US 的诊断性能。

结果

36 个腋窝中,23 个腋窝有转移性淋巴结。与无转移性 LNs 相比,转移性 LNs 的碘密度(p=0.021)、光谱斜率(p<0.001)、Z 有效(p<0.001)、常规 CT HU 值(p<0.01)和 ΔCE(p<0.01)差异均有统计学意义。除 VNC(p=0.092)外,动脉期和门静脉期所有 DLSCT 参数之间均有显著差异(p<0.001)。ΔCE 的诊断性能最高(敏感性 0.79、特异性 0.92、阳性预测值 0.95、阴性预测值 0.69),与常规 CT HU 相比,敏感性显著提高(p=0.027)。ΔCE 的敏感性(p=1.000)或特异性(p=0.320)与腋窝 US 之间无显著差异。

结论

DLSCT 是一种很有前途的评估淋巴结转移的定量技术,有可能减少前哨淋巴结活检的需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98cc/8032829/bd07051d2a85/41747_2021_212_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验