Suppr超能文献

饱足框架:探索促进饱足感的过程。

The Satiation Framework: Exploring processes that contribute to satiation.

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 226 Henderson Building, PA 16802, USA.

Department of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 226 Henderson Building, PA 16802, USA.

出版信息

Physiol Behav. 2021 Jul 1;236:113419. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113419. Epub 2021 Apr 7.

Abstract

Satiation has been described as a process that leads to the termination of eating and controls meal size. However, studies have shown that the termination of eating can be influenced by multiple behavioral and biological processes over the course of a meal as well as those related to the context in which the meal is consumed. To expand understanding of how individuals experience satiation during a meal, we recently developed the Reasons Individuals Stop Eating Questionnaire (RISE-Q). The development of the RISE-Q revealed five distinct factors reported to contribute to meal termination: Planned Amount, Self-Consciousness, Decreased Food Appeal, Physical Satisfaction, and Decreased Priority of Eating. Thus, we define satiation as a series of dynamic processes that emerge over the course of a meal to promote meal termination. We suggest that each of the factors identified by the RISE-Q represents a distinct process, and illustrate the contribution of each process to meal termination in the Satiation Framework. Within this framework the prominence of each process as a reason to stop eating likely depends on meal context in addition to individual variability. Therefore, we discuss contexts in which different processes may be salient as determinants of meal termination. Expanding the definition of satiation to include several dynamic processes as illustrated in the Satiation Framework will help to stimulate investigation and understanding of the complex nature of meal termination.

摘要

饱腹感被描述为一种导致进食终止并控制进食量的过程。然而,研究表明,进食的终止可以受到进食过程中多种行为和生物过程的影响,以及与进食环境相关的过程的影响。为了更深入地了解个体在进食过程中的饱腹感体验,我们最近开发了个体停止进食原因问卷(RISE-Q)。RISE-Q 的开发揭示了五个不同的因素,这些因素被认为有助于进食的终止:计划摄入量、自我意识、食物吸引力降低、身体满足感和进食优先级降低。因此,我们将饱腹感定义为一系列在进食过程中出现的动态过程,以促进进食的终止。我们认为,RISE-Q 中确定的每个因素都代表一个不同的过程,并在饱腹感框架中说明了每个过程对进食终止的贡献。在这个框架中,每个过程作为停止进食的原因的重要性可能不仅取决于个体的变异性,还取决于进食环境。因此,我们讨论了不同过程可能作为进食终止决定因素的突出情况。将饱腹感的定义扩展到包括饱腹感框架中所示的几个动态过程,将有助于激发对进食终止这一复杂性质的研究和理解。

相似文献

1
The Satiation Framework: Exploring processes that contribute to satiation.
Physiol Behav. 2021 Jul 1;236:113419. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2021.113419. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
4
Construct validation of the Reasons Individuals Stop Eating Questionnaire (RISE-Q) and the development of the RISE-Q-15.
Appetite. 2022 Mar 1;170:105898. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105898. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
5
Reasons individuals stop eating questionnaire (RISE-Q) among adults in the United Arab Emirates.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 25;18(10):e0293386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293386. eCollection 2023.
6
7
Remembered Meal Satisfaction, Satiety, and Later Snack Food Intake: A Laboratory Study.
Nutrients. 2018 Dec 3;10(12):1883. doi: 10.3390/nu10121883.
8
Effects of meal variety on expected satiation: evidence for a 'perceived volume' heuristic.
Appetite. 2015 Jun;89:10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.01.010. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
10
Eating behavior in bulimia.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1989;575:446-54; discussion 454-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb53265.x.

引用本文的文献

1
2
"The Big Three" properties of food that drive intake.
Physiol Behav. 2025 Oct 1;299:114994. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.114994. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
3
Perceived motivators and barriers to consuming a plant-based diet: a qualitative research study.
BMC Nutr. 2025 Jun 2;11(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s40795-025-01100-7.
4
Food switching at a meal is positively associated with change in adiposity among children at high-familial risk for obesity.
Appetite. 2025 Apr 1;208:107915. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.107915. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
5
The impact of hunger on indulgent food choices is moderated by healthy eating concerns.
Front Nutr. 2024 Aug 23;11:1377120. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1377120. eCollection 2024.
6
Switching between foods is reliably associated with intake across eating events in children.
Appetite. 2024 Jun 1;197:107325. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107325. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
7
Nutrition to Enhance Metabolic-Bariatric Surgery Outcomes.
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1975-1982. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07159-8. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
8
Chronic pramlintide decreases feeding via a reduction in meal size in male rats.
Peptides. 2024 Jun;176:171197. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2024.171197. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
10
Reasons individuals stop eating questionnaire (RISE-Q) among adults in the United Arab Emirates.
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 25;18(10):e0293386. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293386. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

4
Choice is relative: Reinforcing value of food and activity in obesity treatment.
Am Psychol. 2020 Feb-Mar;75(2):139-151. doi: 10.1037/amp0000521.
5
Breaking Bread: the Functions of Social Eating.
Adapt Human Behav Physiol. 2017;3(3):198-211. doi: 10.1007/s40750-017-0061-4. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
6
Expectancy versus experience - Comparing Portion-Size-Effect during pre-meal planning and actual intake.
Appetite. 2019 Apr 1;135:108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
7
The social facilitation of eating or the facilitation of social eating?
J Eat Disord. 2017 Apr 27;5:16. doi: 10.1186/s40337-017-0146-2. eCollection 2017.
8
Physiologic and Neural Controls of Eating.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;45(4):581-599. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
10
Portion size and intended consumption. Evidence for a pre-consumption portion size effect in males?
Appetite. 2015 Aug;91:83-9. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.04.009. Epub 2015 Apr 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验