Rucker Janet C, Rizzo John-Ross, Hudson Todd E, Horn Anja K E, Buettner-Ennever Jean A, Leigh R John, Optican Lance M
Departments of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Departments of Ophthalmology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
J Comput Neurosci. 2021 Aug;49(3):283-293. doi: 10.1007/s10827-021-00785-6. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
Voluntary rapid eye movements (saccades) redirect the fovea toward objects of visual interest. The saccadic system can be considered as a dual-mode system: in one mode the eye is fixating, in the other it is making a saccade. In this review, we consider two examples of dysfunctional saccades, interrupted saccades in late-onset Tay-Sachs disease and gaze-position dependent opsoclonus after concussion, which fail to properly shift between fixation and saccade modes. Insights and benefits gained from bi-directional collaborative exchange between clinical and basic scientists are emphasized. In the case of interrupted saccades, existing mathematical models were sufficiently detailed to provide support for the cause of interrupted saccades. In the case of gaze-position dependent opsoclonus, existing models could not explain the behavior, but further development provided a reasonable hypothesis for the mechanism underlying the behavior. Collaboration between clinical and basic science is a rich source of progress for developing biologically plausible models and understanding neurological disease. Approaching a clinical problem with a specific hypothesis (model) in mind often prompts new experimental tests and provides insights into basic mechanisms.
自主性快速眼动(扫视)将中央凹重新对准视觉感兴趣的物体。扫视系统可被视为一种双模式系统:在一种模式下眼睛处于注视状态,在另一种模式下眼睛进行扫视。在本综述中,我们考虑了功能失调性扫视的两个例子,即晚发性泰-萨克斯病中的中断性扫视和脑震荡后凝视位置依赖性眼阵挛,它们无法在注视和扫视模式之间正确转换。强调了临床科学家和基础科学家之间双向合作交流所获得的见解和益处。就中断性扫视而言,现有的数学模型足够详细,能够为中断性扫视的原因提供支持。就凝视位置依赖性眼阵挛而言,现有模型无法解释这种行为,但进一步的发展为该行为的潜在机制提供了一个合理的假设。临床科学与基础科学之间的合作是开发具有生物学合理性的模型和理解神经疾病的丰富进步源泉。带着特定假设(模型)去处理临床问题往往会促使进行新的实验测试,并深入了解基本机制。