Li Wenqian, Guo Hanfei, Li Lingyu, Cui Jiuwei
Cancer Center, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 25;11:619376. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.619376. eCollection 2021.
Chemotherapy has been the current standard adjuvant treatment for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, while recent studies showed benefits of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis to comprehensively evaluate the benefit of EGFR-TKI compared with chemotherapy for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after resection from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.
A Markov model was established. Clinical data were based on the phase 3, ADJUVANT trial, where stage II-IIIA, EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients were randomized into gefitinib group or chemotherapy group after resection. Cost parameters mainly included costs of drugs, examinations, and adverse events (AEs). Effect parameters were evaluated by quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Outcomes contained incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), average cost-effective ratio (ACER), and net benefit. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set as 3 times per capita gross domestic product ($30,828/QALY). Sensitivity analyses were also conducted to verify the stability of the model.
Patients who received gefitinib had both a higher cost ($12,057.98 vs. $11,883.73) and a higher QALY (1.55 vs. 1.42) than patients who received chemotherapy. With an ICER of $1,345.62/QALY, adjuvant gefitinib was of economic benefit compared with chemotherapy. The ACER and net benefit were also consistent (gefitinib vs. chemotherapy, ACER: $7,802.30/QALY vs. $8,392.77/QALY; net benefit: $35,584.85 vs. $31,767.17). Sensitivity analyses indicated the stability of the model and the impact of utility.
Adjuvant EGFR-TKI application for early-stage EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients was cost-effective compared with chemotherapy, which might provide a reference for clinical decision-making and medical insurance policy formulation in China.
化疗一直是早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者当前的标准辅助治疗方法,而最近的研究显示了表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKI)的益处。我们进行了一项成本效益分析,从中国医疗保健系统的角度全面评估EGFR-TKI与化疗相比对早期EGFR突变的NSCLC患者术后的益处。
建立了一个马尔可夫模型。临床数据基于3期ADJUVANT试验,其中II-IIIA期EGFR突变的NSCLC患者在切除术后被随机分为吉非替尼组或化疗组。成本参数主要包括药物、检查和不良事件(AE)的费用。效果参数通过质量调整生命年(QALY)进行评估。结果包括增量成本效益比(ICER)、平均成本效益比(ACER)和净效益。支付意愿阈值设定为人均国内生产总值的3倍(30,828美元/QALY)。还进行了敏感性分析以验证模型的稳定性。
接受吉非替尼治疗的患者比接受化疗的患者成本更高(12,057.98美元对11,883.73美元)且QALY更高(1.55对1.42)。辅助性吉非替尼与化疗相比,ICER为1,345.62美元/QALY,具有经济效益。ACER和净效益也一致(吉非替尼对化疗,ACER:7,802.30美元/QALY对8,392.77美元/QALY;净效益:35,584.85美元对31,767.17美元)。敏感性分析表明了模型的稳定性和效用的影响。
与化疗相比,辅助性EGFR-TKI应用于早期EGFR突变的NSCLC患者具有成本效益,这可能为中国的临床决策和医疗保险政策制定提供参考。