Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine and Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (all authors); Penn Implementation Science Center at the Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia (Beidas).
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 Oct 1;72(10):1219-1221. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000209. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
Evidence-based practices (EBPs) are frequently proposed as an approach to close the quality chasm in behavioral health treatment, and many U.S. municipalities are investing in EBPs as a primary way to improve the quality of care delivered to individuals most in need. In this Open Forum, the authors argue that EBPs often cannot be successfully implemented because basic organizational needs are not met in the current fiscal environment. The authors summarize research that supports why EBPs, along with other approaches to improve quality, are likely to fail until there is adequate financing. They also propose a policy and research agenda to ameliorate and address the fiscal challenges inherent in community mental health and substance use services.
循证实践(EBPs)常被提议作为一种方法,以缩小行为健康治疗中的质量差距,许多美国城市正在投资循证实践,将其作为改善最需要人群所接受的护理质量的主要途径。在本论坛文章中,作者认为,由于当前财政环境无法满足基本的组织需求,因此循证实践往往无法成功实施。作者总结了支持为什么循证实践以及其他提高质量的方法可能会失败的研究,除非有足够的资金。他们还提出了一个政策和研究议程,以改善和解决社区心理健康和物质使用服务中固有的财政挑战。