Anastassiadou Maria, Arena Maria, Auteri Domenica, Brancato Alba, Bura Laszlo, Carrasco Cabrera Luis, Chaideftou Eugenia, Chiusolo Arianna, Crivellente Federica, De Lentdecker Chloe, Egsmose Mark, Fait Gabriella, Greco Luna, Ippolito Alessio, Istace Frederique, Jarrah Samira, Kardassi Dimitra, Leuschner Renata, Lostia Alfonso, Lythgo Christopher, Magrans Oriol, Mangas Iris, Miron Ileana, Molnar Tunde, Padovani Laura, Parra Morte Juan Manuel, Pedersen Ragnor, Reich Hermine, Santos Miguel, Sharp Rachel, Szentes Csaba, Terron Andrea, Tiramani Manuela, Vagenende Benedicte, Villamar-Bouza Laura
EFSA J. 2021 Apr 9;19(4):e06495. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6495. eCollection 2021 Apr.
The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Denmark, and co-rapporteur Member State, the Netherlands, for the pesticide active substance subsp. strain EG2348 and the considerations as regards the inclusion of the substance in Annex IV of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of strain EG2348 as an insecticide on pome fruits (field use), solanaceous fruiting vegetables (uses in permanent greenhouse and walk-in tunnel) and ornamentals (field, permanent greenhouse and walk-in tunnel uses). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
报告了欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)在对报告成员国丹麦和共同报告成员国荷兰的主管当局针对农药活性物质亚种菌株EG2348进行的初步风险评估进行同行评审后得出的结论,以及关于将该物质纳入第(EC)No 396/2005号条例附件IV的相关考虑。同行评审的背景是委员会实施条例(EU)No 844/2012(经委员会实施条例(EU)No 2018/1659修订)所要求的。这些结论是在对菌株EG2348作为杀虫剂在梨果类水果(田间使用)、茄果类蔬菜(在永久性温室和步入式隧道中的使用)和观赏植物(田间、永久性温室和步入式隧道使用)上的代表性用途进行评估的基础上得出的。列出了适用于监管风险评估的可靠终点。列出了监管框架要求的缺失信息。识别出了相关问题。