Zwiefelhofer E M, Macmillan K, Gobikrushanth M, Adams G P, Yang S X, Anzar M, Asai-Coakwell M, Colazo M G
Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N 5B4, Canada.
Department of Agricultural Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 2P5, Canada.
Theriogenology. 2021 Jul 1;168:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2021.03.023. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
Commercially available intravaginal progesterone (P4) devices differ in shape, surface area and P4 load, which may affect the resulting pregnancy per AI (P/AI) following timed-AI (TAI). The objective of this study was to compare two intravaginal P4 devices on estrus rate, follicular dynamics and P/AI in beef cattle subjected to shortened-TAI protocols. In Expt. 1, nulliparous heifers were randomly assigned to a P4-releasing intravaginal device (PRID-Delta, 1.55 g P4) or a controlled internal drug release (CIDR, 1.38 g P4) at the initiation of a J-synch protocol. Heifers that displayed estrus 72 h following device removal were TAI, or if not in estrus given GnRH at 72 h and TAI at 90 h. In Expt. 2, nulliparous heifers and non-suckling cows were randomly assigned to either PRID or CIDR groups and either 1 or 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) at initiation of a J-synch protocol. All cattle were TAI concurrent with GnRH 72 h after device removal. In Expt. 3, nulliparous heifers and suckling cows were randomly assigned to either PRID or CIDR groups and initiated a 5-d Cosynch protocol, with TAI concurrent with GnRH 72 h following device removal. In each experiment, cattle received estrus detection patches at device removal, which were then scored from 0 to 3 based on color change between initial application and TAI; 0 = unchanged, 1 = ≤50% change, 2 = >50% change, 3 = missing. Estrus was defined to have occurred when the patch was scored 2 or 3. Transrectal ultrasonography was used to determine cyclicity, diagnose pregnancy in all experiments, and the size of the ovulatory follicle in Expt. 3. In Expt. 1, the estrus rate was greater (72.0% vs. 61.0%; P = 0.04) in the PRID compared to the CIDR group. In Expt. 2, a parity by EB dose interaction (P = 0.02) was attributed to an increased estrus rate (52.8% vs. 41.4%; P = 0.05) in heifers given 1 vs. 2 mg EB. In Expt. 3, there was no difference in the ovulatory follicle diameter at device removal (P = 0.22) or TAI (P = 0.28) between P4 groups. Treatment with a PRID tended (P = 0.10) to increase the P/AI in cows compared to a CIDR (73.5% vs. 61.0%). In all experiments combined, the overall P/AI tended to increase (55.2% vs. 51.0%; P = 0.08) and P/AI in cattle exhibiting estrus increased (64.4% vs. 59.7%; P = 0.02) in cattle given a PRID compared to those given a CIDR, respectively. In summary, the type of intravaginal P4 device affected estrus response and P/AI following TAI in beef cows.
市售的阴道内孕酮(P4)装置在形状、表面积和P4含量上存在差异,这可能会影响定时人工授精(TAI)后的每人工授精妊娠率(P/AI)。本研究的目的是比较两种阴道内P4装置对采用缩短TAI方案的肉牛发情率、卵泡动态和P/AI的影响。在实验1中,未产青年母牛在J同步方案开始时被随机分配到释放P4的阴道内装置(PRID-Delta,含1.55 g P4)或控释内部药物装置(CIDR,含1.38 g P4)组。在取出装置后72小时出现发情的青年母牛进行TAI,若未发情,则在72小时给予促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH),并在90小时进行TAI。在实验2中,未产青年母牛和非哺乳母牛在J同步方案开始时被随机分配到PRID或CIDR组,并给予1或2 mg苯甲酸雌二醇(EB)。所有母牛在取出装置后72小时与GnRH同时进行TAI。在实验3中,未产青年母牛和哺乳母牛被随机分配到PRID或CIDR组,并开始为期5天的Cosynch方案,在取出装置后72小时与GnRH同时进行TAI。在每个实验中,母牛在取出装置时佩戴发情检测贴片,然后根据初始贴片与TAI之间的颜色变化从0到3进行评分;0 = 无变化,1 = 变化≤50%,2 = 变化>50%,3 = 贴片丢失。当贴片评分为2或3时定义为发情。经直肠超声检查用于确定所有实验中的周期性、诊断妊娠,以及实验3中的排卵卵泡大小。在实验1中,与CIDR组相比,PRID组的发情率更高(72.0%对61.0%;P = 0.04)。在实验2中,青年母牛给予1 mg与2 mg EB后,发情率增加(52.8%对41.4%;P = 0.05),这归因于胎次与EB剂量的交互作用(P = 0.02)。在实验3中,P4组之间在取出装置时(P = 0.22)或TAI时(P = 0.28)的排卵卵泡直径没有差异。与CIDR相比,PRID处理的母牛P/AI有增加的趋势(P = 0.10)(73.5%对61.0%)。在所有实验综合分析中,与给予CIDR的母牛相比,给予PRID的母牛总体P/AI有增加的趋势(55.2%对51.0%;P = 0.08),且发情母牛的P/AI增加(64.4%对59.7%;P = 0.02)。总之,阴道内P4装置的类型影响肉牛TAI后的发情反应和P/AI。