Hutzler Mathias, Michel Maximilian, Kunz Oliver, Kuusisto Tiina, Magalhães Frederico, Krogerus Kristoffer, Gibson Brian
Research Center Weihenstephan for Brewing and Food Quality, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd., Espoo, Finland.
Front Microbiol. 2021 Mar 31;12:645271. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.645271. eCollection 2021.
The successful application of and in brewery fermentations has highlighted the potential of wild yeasts for brewing, and prompted investigation into the application potential of other members of the genus. Here, we evaluate, for the first time, the brewing potential of . The newly isolated strain from an ash tree () in Upper Bavaria, Germany, close to the river Isar, was used to ferment a 12°P wort at 15°C. Performance was compared directly with that of a reference lager strain (TUM 34/70) and the type strain. Both wild yeast rapidly depleted simple sugars and thereafter exhibited a lag phase before maltose utilization. This phase lasted for 4 and 10 days for and , respectively. utilized fully the available maltose but, consistent with previous reports, did not use maltotriose. , in contrast, utilized approximately 50% of the maltotriose available, making this the first report of maltotriose utilization in a wild species. Maltotriose use was directly related to alcohol yield with 5.5, 4.9, and 4.5% ABV produced by , , and . Beers also differed with respect to aroma volatiles, with a high level (0.4 mg/L) of the apple/aniseed aroma ethyl hexanoate in beers, while beers had a high level of phenylethanol (100 mg/L). A trained panel rated all beers as being of high quality, but noted clear differences. A phenolic spice/clove note was prominent in beer. This was less pronounced in the beers, despite analytical levels of 4-vinylguaiacol being similar. Tropical fruit notes were pronounced in beers, possibly resulting from the high level of ethyl hexanoate. Herein, we present results from the first intentional application of as a yeast for beer fermentation (at the time of submission) and compare its fermentation performance to other species of the genus. Results indicate considerable potential for application in brewing, with clear advantages compared to other wild species.
[某种酵母名称1]和[某种酵母名称2]在啤酒酿造发酵中的成功应用凸显了野生[酵母属名称]酵母在酿造方面的潜力,并促使人们对该属其他成员的应用潜力展开研究。在此,我们首次评估了[某种酵母名称3]的酿造潜力。从德国上巴伐利亚靠近伊萨尔河的一棵白蜡树([树名])上新分离出的菌株,被用于在15°C下发酵12°P麦芽汁。将其性能直接与参考拉格酵母菌株(TUM 34/70)和[某种酵母类型名称]模式菌株进行比较。两种野生酵母都迅速消耗了单糖,此后在利用麦芽糖之前出现了停滞期。[某种酵母名称1]和[某种酵母名称2]的这一阶段分别持续了4天和10天。[某种酵母名称3]充分利用了可用的麦芽糖,但与之前的报道一致,不利用麦芽三糖。相比之下,[某种酵母名称2]利用了约50%的可用麦芽三糖,这是野生[酵母属名称]物种中首次关于利用麦芽三糖的报道。麦芽三糖的利用与酒精产量直接相关,[某种酵母名称1]、[某种酵母名称2]和[某种酵母名称3]产生的酒精体积分数分别为5.5%、4.9%和4.5%。啤酒在香气挥发物方面也存在差异,[某种酵母名称1]啤酒中苹果/茴芹香气的己酸乙酯含量较高(0.4毫克/升),而[某种酵母名称2]啤酒中苯乙醇含量较高(100毫克/升)。一个专业品鉴小组将所有啤酒都评为高品质,但指出了明显的差异。[某种酵母名称3]啤酒中酚类香料/丁香的味道很突出。尽管分析得出的4 - 乙烯基愈创木酚水平相似,但在[某种酵母名称2]啤酒中这种味道不太明显。[某种酵母名称2]啤酒中热带水果的味道很明显,这可能是由于己酸乙酯含量较高。在此,我们展示了首次有意将[某种酵母名称3]用作啤酒发酵酵母(在提交本文时)的结果,并将其发酵性能与该属的其他物种进行比较。结果表明[某种酵母名称3]在酿造中的应用潜力很大,与其他野生[酵母属名称]物种相比具有明显优势。