Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
J Viral Hepat. 2021 Jul;28(7):1068-1077. doi: 10.1111/jvh.13516. Epub 2021 May 3.
The impact of hepatitis C cure with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in community settings remains unclear. We aimed to assess changes in PROs over time and whether treatment was associated with sustained improved PROs in a cohort of people who inject drugs. This study is a sub-analysis of the Treatment and Prevention Study, a nurse-led trial where people who inject drugs and their injecting partners were recruited in a community setting, in Melbourne, Australia. Three participant groups were characterized: treatment, untreated and non-viremic (hepatitis C RNA negative at screening). PROs included assessment of health-related quality of life using the Short Form-8 (SF-8) Survey and life satisfaction using Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI). PROs were measured at baseline and every 12 weeks until week 84. Generalized estimating equations were used to measure whether treatment was associated with longitudinal PRO change. A total of 215 participants were included in this analysis. PWI scores were significantly higher at week 12 for both treatment group (p = 0.0309) and non-viremic group (p = 0.0437) compared to baseline. However, treatment was not associated with longitudinal change in PRO scores. In conclusion, we found DAA treatment did not significantly improve PRO scores compared to those not receiving treatment and without hepatitis C. The measures used in this study may not be sensitive enough to capture the hepatitis C specific improvements in quality of life that treatment affords or factors other than treatment may be influencing quality of life scores in this cohort.
直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)治愈丙型肝炎对社区环境中患者报告结局(PRO)的影响尚不清楚。我们旨在评估随着时间的推移 PRO 的变化,以及治疗是否与注射吸毒者队列中持续改善的 PRO 相关。本研究是治疗和预防研究的一项子分析,该研究是一项由护士主导的试验,在澳大利亚墨尔本的社区环境中招募了注射吸毒者及其注射伙伴。将参与者分为三组:治疗组、未治疗组和非病毒血症组(筛选时丙型肝炎 RNA 阴性)。PRO 包括使用简短形式 8 项(SF-8)调查评估健康相关生活质量和使用个人幸福感指数(PWI)评估生活满意度。在基线和每 12 周直至第 84 周测量 PRO。使用广义估计方程来衡量治疗是否与纵向 PRO 变化相关。本分析共纳入 215 名参与者。与基线相比,治疗组(p=0.0309)和非病毒血症组(p=0.0437)在第 12 周时 PWI 评分显著升高。然而,治疗与 PRO 评分的纵向变化无关。总之,与未接受治疗且无丙型肝炎的患者相比,我们发现 DAA 治疗并未显著改善 PRO 评分。本研究中使用的措施可能不够敏感,无法捕捉到治疗带来的丙型肝炎生活质量特定改善,或者可能是其他因素影响了该队列的生活质量评分。