Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Departamento de Enfermagem, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2021 Apr 16;55:e03689. doi: 10.1590/S1980-220X2019041403689. eCollection 2021.
To validate the content of the diagnosis Risk for disturbed maternal-fetal dyad in high-risk pregnant women.
Nursing diagnosis content analysis study in which 48 nurses evaluated agreement regarding title, definition, class, and domain of the studied nursing diagnosis, as well as the relevance of its antecedents. The items were considered relevant when the Confidence Interval of the Content Validity Index was 0.8 or higher. When lower, the item was modified or excluded according to the experts' suggestions.
Out of 21 antecedents, 14 were considered relevant. The labels of five elements considered irrelevant were changed, and one item was excluded. The experts did not choose the title and definition proposed by NANDA-I, preferring instead the ones suggested in this study. The experts agreed with the class and domain proposed by the taxonomy.
Ten risk factors, four populations at risk, and six associated conditions for this nursing diagnosis were maintained; these may provide a basis for nursing practice. The phase of clinical validation is suggested to be conducted to corroborate this study's results.
验证高危孕妇母婴双体紊乱风险的诊断内容。
护理诊断内容分析研究,其中 48 名护士评估了对所研究护理诊断的标题、定义、类别和领域以及其前驱因素的一致性,内容效度指数置信区间为 0.8 或更高时,项目被认为是相关的。如果较低,则根据专家的建议修改或排除项目。
在 21 个前驱因素中,有 14 个被认为是相关的。被认为不相关的五个元素的标签已更改,并且排除了一个项目。专家没有选择 NANDA-I 提出的标题和定义,而是选择了本研究中建议的标题和定义。专家同意分类法提出的类别和领域。
维持了该护理诊断的 10 个风险因素、4 个高危人群和 6 个相关情况;这些可能为护理实践提供依据。建议进行临床验证阶段,以证实本研究的结果。