Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Country Meadows Retirement Community, Hershey, PA, USA.
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):949-961. doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
Evaluating engagement in a research partnership can capture the success and impact of the research team-stakeholder partnerships. This article describes the Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP), an iterative method to develop an evaluation that reflects research team-stakeholder collective values, language, and priorities. We describe our implementation of the SCIP and provide the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Evaluation, an evaluation developed in collaboration with our advisory committee. Mean scores across three administrations of the tool remained constant. We monitored responses received from our advisory committee during each administration for changes in scores that guided refinements to our stakeholder engagement strategy. Face validity and acceptability questions showed high satisfaction for the tool's time required to complete, ( = 4.50, = 0.86), clarity ( = 4.56, = 0.78), and relevance ( = 4.67, = 0.49) (maximum score = 5). The SCIP methodology and the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Tool can be used during study planning and data collection to capture research team-stakeholder collaborations that reflect stakeholder priorities.
评估研究伙伴关系中的参与度可以捕捉研究团队-利益相关者伙伴关系的成功和影响。本文描述了利益相关者为中心的工具开发过程(SCIP),这是一种迭代方法,可以开发出一种反映研究团队-利益相关者集体价值观、语言和优先事项的评估。我们描述了我们对 SCIP 的实施,并提供了利益相关者为中心的参与度评估,这是与我们的顾问委员会合作开发的一种评估。该工具在三次管理中的平均得分保持不变。我们在每次管理期间监测顾问委员会收到的反馈,以了解分数的变化,从而指导我们的利益相关者参与策略的改进。对工具完成所需时间( = 4.50, = 0.86)、清晰度( = 4.56, = 0.78)和相关性( = 4.67, = 0.49)的正面有效性和可接受性问题的满意度较高(最高得分为 5)。SCIP 方法和利益相关者为中心的参与工具可在研究计划和数据收集过程中使用,以捕捉反映利益相关者优先事项的研究团队-利益相关者合作。