Suppr超能文献

评估利益相关者参与度:以利益相关者为中心的工具制定流程(SCIP)。

Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP).

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Country Meadows Retirement Community, Hershey, PA, USA.

出版信息

West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):949-961. doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274. Epub 2021 Apr 24.

Abstract

Evaluating engagement in a research partnership can capture the success and impact of the research team-stakeholder partnerships. This article describes the Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP), an iterative method to develop an evaluation that reflects research team-stakeholder collective values, language, and priorities. We describe our implementation of the SCIP and provide the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Evaluation, an evaluation developed in collaboration with our advisory committee. Mean scores across three administrations of the tool remained constant. We monitored responses received from our advisory committee during each administration for changes in scores that guided refinements to our stakeholder engagement strategy. Face validity and acceptability questions showed high satisfaction for the tool's time required to complete, ( = 4.50,  = 0.86), clarity ( = 4.56,  = 0.78), and relevance ( = 4.67,  = 0.49) (maximum score = 5). The SCIP methodology and the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Tool can be used during study planning and data collection to capture research team-stakeholder collaborations that reflect stakeholder priorities.

摘要

评估研究伙伴关系中的参与度可以捕捉研究团队-利益相关者伙伴关系的成功和影响。本文描述了利益相关者为中心的工具开发过程(SCIP),这是一种迭代方法,可以开发出一种反映研究团队-利益相关者集体价值观、语言和优先事项的评估。我们描述了我们对 SCIP 的实施,并提供了利益相关者为中心的参与度评估,这是与我们的顾问委员会合作开发的一种评估。该工具在三次管理中的平均得分保持不变。我们在每次管理期间监测顾问委员会收到的反馈,以了解分数的变化,从而指导我们的利益相关者参与策略的改进。对工具完成所需时间( = 4.50, = 0.86)、清晰度( = 4.56, = 0.78)和相关性( = 4.67, = 0.49)的正面有效性和可接受性问题的满意度较高(最高得分为 5)。SCIP 方法和利益相关者为中心的参与工具可在研究计划和数据收集过程中使用,以捕捉反映利益相关者优先事项的研究团队-利益相关者合作。

相似文献

1
Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP).
West J Nurs Res. 2021 Oct;43(10):949-961. doi: 10.1177/01939459211004274. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
2
Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement Through the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC).
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):105-108. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07029-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
3
6
Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services.
Health Expect. 2023 Oct;26(5):1997-2012. doi: 10.1111/hex.13808. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
7
Evaluation of a stakeholder advisory board for an adolescent mental health randomized clinical trial.
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 28;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00425-6.
9
Setting a research agenda for vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome using a patient and stakeholder engagement model.
J Vasc Surg. 2020 Oct;72(4):1436-1444.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.043. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
10
Pragmatic Considerations in Incorporating Stakeholder Engagement Into a Palliative Care Transitions Study.
Med Care. 2021 Aug 1;59(Suppl 4):S370-S378. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001583.

引用本文的文献

2
Patient engagement in designing, conducting, and disseminating clinical pain research: IMMPACT recommended considerations.
Pain. 2024 May 1;165(5):1013-1028. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003121. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
3
Promoting community engagement in spinal cord injury research: a case example.
Spinal Cord. 2023 Nov;61(11):632-635. doi: 10.1038/s41393-023-00926-x. Epub 2023 Aug 17.
4
Evaluation of a stakeholder advisory board for an adolescent mental health randomized clinical trial.
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 28;9(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00425-6.
5
Operationalizing Stakeholder Engagement Through the Stakeholder-Centric Engagement Charter (SCEC).
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Apr;37(Suppl 1):105-108. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07029-4. Epub 2022 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Reaching Consensus on Principles of Stakeholder Engagement in Research.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2020;14(1):117-127. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2020.0014.
2
Stakeholder engagement in research: a scoping review of current evaluation methods.
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Nov;8(15):1327-1341. doi: 10.2217/cer-2019-0047. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
3
Content validation of a quantitative stakeholder engagement measure.
J Community Psychol. 2019 Nov;47(8):1937-1951. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22239. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
4
PaTH to partnership in stakeholder-engaged research: A framework for stakeholder engagement in the PaTH to Health Diabetes study.
Healthc (Amst). 2020 Mar;8(1):100361. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2019.05.001. Epub 2019 May 14.
5
Facilitating public and patient involvement in basic and preclinical health research.
PLoS One. 2019 May 14;14(5):e0216600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216600. eCollection 2019.
6
Herding cats and other epic challenges: Creating meaningful stakeholder engagement in community mental health research.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Apr;42:19-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.03.019. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
7
Patient Engagement In Research: Early Findings From The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):359-367. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05067.
10
Patient and public engagement in research and health system decision making: A systematic review of evaluation tools.
Health Expect. 2018 Dec;21(6):1075-1084. doi: 10.1111/hex.12804. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验