Suppr超能文献

双相磷酸钙与脱蛋白牛骨在临界尺寸骨缺损中的组织学比较。

Histological Comparison between Biphasic Calcium Phosphate and Deproteinized Bovine Bone on Critical-Size Bone Defects.

机构信息

Department of Dentistry, UP - Universidade Positivo, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Departament of Dentistry, UEPG - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz Dent J. 2021 Jan-Feb;32(1):26-33. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440202103583.

Abstract

The limited options for bone repair have led to an extensive research of the field and the development of alloplastic and xenogeneic grafts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate bone repair with two bone substitutes: deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (BCP) in critical-size defect. A total of 8-mm defects were made in the parietal bones of rabbits (n=12). The animals were divided into three experimental groups: sham (defect filled with a blood clot), DBB (defect filled with DBB), and BCP (defect filled with BCP). After the experimental periods of 15 and 45 days, the animals were euthanized and submitted to histomorphometric analysis. The total defect area, mineralized tissue area, biomaterial area, and soft tissue area were evaluated. A greater amount of immature bone tissue and biomaterial particles were observed in the BCP group compared to DBB and sham at 45 days (p<0.05). There was no difference in the qualitative pattern of bone deposition between DBB and BCP. However, the sham group did not show osteoid islands along with the defect, presenting a greater amount of collagen fibers as well in relation to the DBB and BCP groups. There was a greater number of inflammatory cells in the DBB at 45 days compared to BCP and sham groups. In conclusion, BCP and DBB are options for optimizing the use of bone grafts for maxillofacial rehabilitation. Bone defects treated with BCP showed greater deposition of bone tissue at 45 days.

摘要

骨修复选择有限,这导致了该领域的广泛研究和同种异体及异种移植物的发展。本研究旨在评估两种骨替代物在临界尺寸缺损中的骨修复效果:脱蛋白牛骨(DBB)和双相磷酸钙陶瓷(BCP)。在兔顶骨上制造总共 8mm 的缺损(n=12)。动物分为三组:假手术组(缺损内填充血凝块)、DBB 组(缺损内填充 DBB)和 BCP 组(缺损内填充 BCP)。在 15 和 45 天的实验期后,处死动物并进行组织形态计量学分析。评估总缺损面积、矿化组织面积、生物材料面积和软组织面积。与 DBB 和假手术组相比,在 45 天时,BCP 组观察到更多未成熟的骨组织和生物材料颗粒(p<0.05)。DBB 和 BCP 之间的骨沉积定性模式没有差异。然而,与 DBB 和 BCP 组相比,假手术组在缺损处没有出现类骨质岛,并且胶原纤维的数量也更多。与 BCP 和假手术组相比,在 45 天时,DBB 中的炎症细胞数量更多。总之,BCP 和 DBB 是优化颌面修复中使用骨移植物的选择。用 BCP 治疗的骨缺损在 45 天时显示出更多的骨组织沉积。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验