Instituto Politécnico de Viana do Castelo, Escola Superior Desporto e Lazer, Rua Escola Industrial e Comercial de Nun'Álvares, 4900-347 Viana do Castelo, Portugal.
Department of Physical Education and Sport, University of the Basque Country, UPV-EHU, Lasarte 71, 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain.
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 8;21(8):2623. doi: 10.3390/s21082623.
This systematic review aimed to (1) identify and summarize studies that have examined the validity of apps for measuring human strength, power, velocity, and change-of-direction, and (2) identify and summarize studies that have examined the reliability of apps for measuring human strength, power, velocity, and change-of-direction. A systematic review of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scielo, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases was performed, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. From the 435 studies initially identified, 23 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. In total, 11 mobile applications were analyzed and summarized for their validity and reliability to test movement velocity, movement time, movement displacement, power output, and workload. The present systematic review revealed that the tested apps are valid and reliable for measuring bar movement velocity during lower and upper body resistance exercises; however, systematic bias was detected with heavier loads.
(1) 识别和总结评估人体力量、功率、速度和变向能力的应用程序的有效性的研究;(2) 识别和总结评估人体力量、功率、速度和变向能力的应用程序的可靠性的研究。根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南,对 Cochrane Library、EBSCO、PubMed、Scielo、Scopus、SPORTDiscus 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了系统评价。从最初确定的 435 项研究中,有 23 项进行了全面审查,并提取和分析了其结果测量值。共有 11 个移动应用程序对其有效性和可靠性进行了分析和总结,用于测试运动速度、运动时间、运动位移、功率输出和工作量。本系统评价表明,测试的应用程序在评估上下肢抗阻运动中的棒运动速度时是有效和可靠的;然而,在使用更重的负荷时,检测到系统偏差。