Posada-Ordax Jorge, Cosin-Matamoros Julia, Losa-Iglesias Marta Elena, Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo Ricardo, Esteban-Gonzalo Laura, Martin-Villa Carlos, Calvo-Lobo César, Rodriguez-Sanz David
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, 28933 Madrid, Spain.
Facultad de Enfermería, Fisioterapia y Podología, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2021 Apr 21;10(9):1804. doi: 10.3390/jcm10091804.
In recent years, interest in finding alternatives for the evaluation of mobility has increased. Inertial measurement units (IMUs) stand out for their portability, size, and low price. The objective of this study was to examine the accuracy and repeatability of a commercially available IMU under controlled conditions in healthy subjects. A total of 36 subjects, including 17 males and 19 females were analyzed with a Wiva Science IMU in a corridor test while walking for 10 m and in a threadmill at 1.6 km/h, 2.4 km/h, 3.2 km/h, 4 km/h, and 4.8 km/h for one minute. We found no difference when we compared the variables at 4 km/h and 4.8 km/h. However, we found greater differences and errors at 1.6 km/h, 2.4 km/h and 3.2 km/h, and the latter one (1.6 km/h) generated more error. The main conclusion is that the Wiva Science IMU is reliable at high speeds but loses reliability at low speeds.
近年来,人们对寻找活动能力评估替代方法的兴趣与日俱增。惯性测量单元(IMU)因其便携性、尺寸小和价格低廉而备受瞩目。本研究的目的是在健康受试者的受控条件下,检验一款商用IMU的准确性和可重复性。共有36名受试者参与研究,其中男性17名,女性19名。在走廊测试中,受试者使用Wiva Science IMU行走10米;在跑步机上,受试者分别以1.6公里/小时、2.4公里/小时、3.2公里/小时、4公里/小时和4.8公里/小时的速度行走一分钟。我们发现,在4公里/小时和4.8公里/小时时比较各变量,未发现差异。然而,在1.6公里/小时、2.4公里/小时和3.2公里/小时时,我们发现了更大的差异和误差,且后者(1.6公里/小时)产生的误差更大。主要结论是,Wiva Science IMU在高速时可靠,但在低速时可靠性降低。