Domínguez-Maqueda Marta, Cerezo Isabel M, Tapia-Paniagua Silvana Teresa, De La Banda Inés García, Moreno-Ventas Xabier, Moriñigo Miguel Ángel, Balebona Maria Carmen
Departamento de Química Inorgánica, Cristalografía y Mineralogía, Facultad de Ciencias, Campus de Teatinos s/n, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain.
Spanish Institute of Oceanography, Oceanographic Center of Santander, 39080 Santander, Spain.
Microorganisms. 2021 Apr 12;9(4):808. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040808.
Concerns about safety, applicability and functionality associated with live probiotic cells have led to consideration of the use of non-viable microorganisms, known as paraprobiotics. The present study evaluated the effects of dietary administration of heat-inactivated cells of the probiotic strain Ppd11 on the intestinal microbiota and immune gene transcription in . Results obtained were evaluated and compared to those described after feeding with viable Pdp11 cells. specimens were fed with basal (control) diet or supplemented with live or heat inactivated (60 °C, 1 h) probiotics diets for 45 days. Growth improvement was observed in the group receiving live probiotics compared to the control group, but not after feeding with a probiotic heat-inactivated diet. Regarding immune gene transcription, no changes were observed for , , , , , and in the intestinal samples based on the diet. On the contrary, , , , , , and transcription were modulated after probiotic supplementation, though no differences between viable and heat-inactivated probiotic supplemented diets were observed. Modulation of intestinal microbiota showed remarkable differences based on the viability of the probiotics. Thus, higher diversity in fish fed with live probiotic cells, jointly with increased and to the detriment of , was detected. However, microbiota of fish receiving heat-inactivated probiotic cells showed decreased and increased and genus abundance. In short, the results obtained indicate that the viable state of Pdp11 probiotic cells affects growth performance and modulation of intestinal microbiota. On the contrary, minor changes were detected in the intestinal immune response, being similar for fish receiving both, viable and inactivated probiotic cell supplemented diets, when compared to the control diet.
对活的益生菌细胞的安全性、适用性和功能的担忧导致了对使用非活性微生物(即副益生菌)的考虑。本研究评估了日粮中添加热灭活的益生菌菌株Ppd11细胞对虹鳟肠道微生物群和免疫基因转录的影响。将获得的结果进行评估,并与投喂活的Pdp11细胞后所描述的结果进行比较。给虹鳟投喂基础(对照)日粮或添加活的或热灭活(60℃,1小时)益生菌的日粮,持续45天。与对照组相比,接受活益生菌的组生长有所改善,但投喂热灭活益生菌日粮后未观察到生长改善。关于免疫基因转录,基于日粮,在肠道样本中未观察到白细胞介素-1β(IL-1β)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、干扰素-γ(IFN-γ)和转化生长因子-β(TGF-β)的变化。相反,在补充益生菌后,白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、干扰素调节因子-1(IRF-1)、热休克蛋白70(HSP70)、热休克蛋白90(HSP90)、核因子κB(NF-κB)和诱导型一氧化氮合酶(iNOS)的转录受到调节,尽管在补充活的和热灭活的益生菌日粮之间未观察到差异。基于益生菌的活力,肠道微生物群的调节显示出显著差异。因此,检测到投喂活益生菌细胞的鱼具有更高的多样性,同时乳酸杆菌属(Lactobacillus)和双歧杆菌属(Bifidobacterium)增加,而气单胞菌属(Aeromonas)减少。然而,接受热灭活益生菌细胞的鱼的微生物群显示气单胞菌属减少,肠杆菌属(Enterobacter)和不动杆菌属(Acinetobacter)丰度增加。简而言之,获得的结果表明Pdp11益生菌细胞的存活状态影响生长性能和虹鳟肠道微生物群的调节。相反,在肠道免疫反应中检测到的变化较小,与对照日粮相比,接受活的和灭活的益生菌细胞补充日粮的鱼的肠道免疫反应相似。