• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西第二大人口州管理和应对 COVID-19 疫情的脆弱性分析。

A Vulnerability Analysis for the Management of and Response to the COVID-19 Epidemic in the Second Most Populous State in Brazil.

机构信息

Undergraduate Medical, Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.

Undergraduate Course in Collective Health, Institute of Geography, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;9:586670. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.586670. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2021.586670
PMID:33928060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8076526/
Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to affect all individuals, however in a heterogeneous way. In this sense, identifying specificities of each location is essential to minimize the damage caused by the disease. Therefore, the aim of this research was to assess the vulnerability of 853 municipalities in the second most populous state in Brazil, Minas Gerais (MG), in order to direct public policies. An epidemiological study was carried out based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) using indicators with some relation to the process of illness and death caused by COVID-19. The indicators were selected by a literature search and categorized into: demographic, social, economic, health infrastructure, population at risk and epidemiological. The variables were collected in Brazilian government databases at the municipal level and evaluated according to MCDA, through the Program to Support Decision Making based on Indicators (PRADIN). Based on this approach, the study performed simulations by category of indicators and a general simulation that allowed to divide the municipalities into groups of 1-5, with 1 being the least vulnerable and 5 being the most vulnerable. The groupings of municipalities were exposed in their respective mesoregions of MG in a thematic map, using the software Tabwin 32. The results revealed that the mesoregion of Norte de Minas stands out with more than 40% of its municipalities belonging to group 5, according to economic, social and health infrastructure indicators. Similarly, the Jequitinhonha mesoregion exhibited almost 60% of the municipalities in this group for economic and health infrastructure indicators. For demographic and epidemiological criteria, the Metropolitana de Belo Horizonte was the most vulnerable mesoregion, with 42.9 and 26.7% of the municipalities in group 5, respectively. Considering the presence of a population at risk, Zona da Mata reported 42.3% of the municipalities in the most vulnerable group. In the joint analysis of data, the Jequitinhonha, Vale do Mucuri and Vale do Rio Doce mesoregions were the most vulnerable in the state of MG. Thus, through the outlined profile, the present study proved how socioeconomic diversity affects the vulnerability of the municipalities to face COVID-19 outbreak, highlighting the need for interventions directed to each reality.

摘要

新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)有可能影响到所有个体,但影响方式存在差异。从这个意义上说,确定每个地点的特殊性对于将疾病造成的损害降到最低至关重要。因此,本研究旨在评估巴西第二大人口州米纳斯吉拉斯州(MG)的 853 个城市的脆弱性,以便指导公共政策。这是一项基于多准则决策分析(MCDA)的流行病学研究,使用与 COVID-19 导致的疾病和死亡过程有一定关系的指标。这些指标是通过文献检索选择的,并分为:人口统计学、社会、经济、卫生基础设施、高危人群和流行病学。将变量收集在巴西政府的市级数据库中,并根据 MCDA 通过基于指标的决策支持计划(PRADIN)进行评估。基于这种方法,该研究按指标类别进行了模拟,并进行了一次总体模拟,将城市分为 1-5 组,1 组为脆弱性最低,5 组为脆弱性最高。利用软件 Tabwin 32,将这些城市的分组暴露在米纳斯吉拉斯州各自的次区域的专题地图中。结果表明,北米纳斯次区域的经济、社会和卫生基础设施指标中有 40%以上的城市属于第 5 组。同样,杰赛廷霍尼亚次区域的经济和卫生基础设施指标中有近 60%的城市属于第 5 组。在人口统计学和流行病学标准方面,贝洛奥里藏特大都市地区是最脆弱的次区域,5 组中有 42.9%和 26.7%的城市。考虑到高危人群的存在,马托格罗索地区有 42.3%的城市属于最脆弱的组。在数据的联合分析中,杰赛廷霍尼亚、穆库里河谷和里奥多塞河谷次区域是米纳斯吉拉斯州最脆弱的地区。因此,通过概述的概况,本研究证明了社会经济多样性如何影响城市应对 COVID-19 爆发的脆弱性,强调了针对每个现实情况进行干预的必要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8de/8076526/c3dad9854602/fpubh-09-586670-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8de/8076526/cb366afc264a/fpubh-09-586670-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8de/8076526/6a80bab3c8ee/fpubh-09-586670-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8de/8076526/c3dad9854602/fpubh-09-586670-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8de/8076526/cb366afc264a/fpubh-09-586670-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8de/8076526/6a80bab3c8ee/fpubh-09-586670-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8de/8076526/c3dad9854602/fpubh-09-586670-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
A Vulnerability Analysis for the Management of and Response to the COVID-19 Epidemic in the Second Most Populous State in Brazil.巴西第二大人口州管理和应对 COVID-19 疫情的脆弱性分析。
Front Public Health. 2021 Apr 13;9:586670. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.586670. eCollection 2021.
2
Spatial and temporal trends of visceral leishmaniasis by mesoregion in a southeastern state of Brazil, 2002-2013.巴西东南部一个州内脏利什曼病按次区域的时空趋势,2002-2013 年。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 6;11(10):e0005950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005950. eCollection 2017 Oct.
3
Spatiotemporal dynamics and risk estimates of COVID-19 epidemic in Minas Gerais State: analysis of an expanding process.巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州 COVID-19 疫情的时空动态和风险估计:扩张过程分析。
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2021 Mar 24;63:e21. doi: 10.1590/S1678-9946202163021. eCollection 2021.
4
Effect of socioeconomic inequalities and vulnerabilities on health-system preparedness and response to COVID-19 in Brazil: a comprehensive analysis.巴西社会经济不平等和脆弱性对新冠疫情防控准备和应对的影响:一项综合分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2021 Jun;9(6):e782-e792. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00081-4. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
5
(Un)Equitable distribution of health resources and the judicialization of healthcare: 10 years of experience in Brazil.(非)公平的卫生资源分配与医疗保健的司法化:巴西的 10 年经验。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jun 3;18(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-0914-5.
6
COVID-19 in medium-sized municipalities in the 14 health macro-regions of Minas Gerais, Brazil.巴西米纳斯吉拉斯州 14 个卫生大区中型城市的 COVID-19 疫情。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2021 Aug 20;54(11):e11191. doi: 10.1590/1414-431X2021e11191. eCollection 2021.
7
Were the socio-economic determinants of municipalities relevant to the increment of COVID-19 related deaths in Brazil in 2020?2020 年,巴西各城市的社会经济决定因素与与 COVID-19 相关的死亡人数增加有关吗?
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 28;17(4):e0266109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266109. eCollection 2022.
8
Vulnerability to COVID-19 in Pernambuco, Brazil: A geospatial evaluation supported by multiple-criteria decision aid methodology.巴西伯南布哥州对 COVID-19 的脆弱性:基于多标准决策辅助方法的地理空间评估。
Geospat Health. 2022 Jan 14;17(s1). doi: 10.4081/gh.2022.1000.
9
Association of socioeconomic indicators with COVID-19 mortality in Brazil: a population-based ecological study.巴西社会经济指标与 COVID-19 死亡率的关联:基于人群的生态学研究。
Geospat Health. 2023 Jul 13;18(2). doi: 10.4081/gh.2023.1206.
10
Analysis of public policies to combat COVID-19 in the state of Paraná, Brazil.巴西巴拉那州抗击新冠疫情的公共政策分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 17;12:1384561. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1384561. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Age, gender and household infrastructural inequality in COVID-19: Contextual analysis of Mamelodi.年龄、性别和家庭基础设施不平等与 COVID-19:对马梅洛迪的背景分析。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2024 Jul 22;66(1):e1-e8. doi: 10.4102/safp.v66i1.5924.
2
Pandemic vulnerability index of US cities: A hybrid knowledge-based and data-driven approach.美国城市的大流行脆弱性指数:一种基于知识与数据驱动的混合方法。
Sustain Cities Soc. 2023 Aug;95:104570. doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2023.104570. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
3
A district-level vulnerability assessment of next COVID-19 variant (Omicron BA.2) in Uttarakhand using quantitative SWOT analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Isolation of 2019-nCoV from a Stool Specimen of a Laboratory-Confirmed Case of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).从一名实验室确诊的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病例的粪便样本中分离出2019新型冠状病毒。
China CDC Wkly. 2020 Feb 21;2(8):123-124.
2
Underreporting of Death by COVID-19 in Brazil's Second Most Populous State.巴西第二大人口州 COVID-19 死亡漏报情况严重。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;8:578645. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.578645. eCollection 2020.
3
A vulnerability index for the management of and response to the COVID-19 epidemic in India: an ecological study.
使用定量SWOT分析法对北阿坎德邦下一个新冠病毒变种(奥密克戎BA.2)进行的区级脆弱性评估。
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022 Nov 3:1-30. doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02727-3.
4
Evaluation of the vulnerability to public health events in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area.评估粤港澳大湾区公共卫生事件的脆弱性。
Front Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;10:946015. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.946015. eCollection 2022.
5
Assessing Response Readiness to Health Emergencies: A Spatial Evaluation of Health and Socio-Economic Justice in Pakistan.评估应对突发卫生事件的准备情况:巴基斯坦卫生与社会经济公平性的空间评估
Soc Indic Res. 2022 Apr 25:1-31. doi: 10.1007/s11205-022-02922-9.
6
Infrastructural Inequality and Household COVID-19 Vulnerability in a South African Urban Settlement.基础设施不平等与南非城市住区家庭的 COVID-19 脆弱性
J Urban Health. 2022 Jun;99(3):571-581. doi: 10.1007/s11524-022-00625-7. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
7
Analyzing the Risk to COVID-19 Infection using Remote Sensing and GIS.利用遥感和 GIS 分析 COVID-19 感染风险。
Risk Anal. 2021 May;41(5):801-813. doi: 10.1111/risa.13724. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
8
Underreporting of Death by COVID-19 in Brazil's Second Most Populous State.巴西第二大人口州 COVID-19 死亡漏报情况严重。
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 15;8:578645. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.578645. eCollection 2020.
印度 COVID-19 疫情管理和应对的脆弱性指数:一项生态学研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1142-e1151. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30300-4. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Analyzing COVID-19 pandemic for unequal distribution of tests, identified cases, deaths, and fatality rates in the top 18 countries.分析新冠疫情在18个主要国家中检测、确诊病例、死亡病例及死亡率的不平等分布情况。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020 Sep-Oct;14(5):953-961. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.06.051. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
5
Measures of frequency: calculating prevalence and incidence in the era of COVID-19.频率测量:在新冠疫情时代计算患病率和发病率。
J Bras Pneumol. 2020 Jun 15;46(3):e20200243. doi: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20200243.
6
Estimating the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe.估算非药物干预措施对欧洲 COVID-19 疫情的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2405-7. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the COVID-19 pandemic.大规模防疫政策对 COVID-19 大流行的影响。
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):262-267. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2404-8. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
8
Poverty, inequality and COVID-19: the forgotten vulnerable.贫困、不平等与新冠疫情:被遗忘的弱势群体。
Public Health. 2020 Jun;183:110-111. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.006. Epub 2020 May 14.
9
Effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 cases, deaths, and demand for hospital services in the UK: a modelling study.非药物干预对英国 COVID-19 病例、死亡和医院服务需求的影响:一项建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Jul;5(7):e375-e385. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30133-X. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
10
Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.物理隔离、口罩和眼部防护预防 SARS-CoV-2 和 COVID-19 的人际传播:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):1973-1987. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9. Epub 2020 Jun 1.