Division of Neurobiology and Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185 Linköping, Sweden.
Division of Neurobiology and Center for Social and Affective Neuroscience, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, S-58185 Linköping, Sweden
J Neurosci. 2021 Jun 16;41(24):5206-5218. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0313-21.2021. Epub 2021 May 3.
We examined the signaling route for fever during localized inflammation in male and female mice, elicited by casein injection into a preformed air pouch. The localized inflammation gave rise to high concentrations of prostaglandins of the E species (PGE) and cytokines in the air pouch and elevated levels of these inflammatory mediators in plasma. There were also elevated levels of PGE in the cerebrospinal fluid, although there was little evidence for PGE synthesis in the brain. Global deletion of the PGE prostaglandin E receptor 3 (EP) abolished the febrile response as did deletion of the EP receptor in neural cells, whereas its deletion on peripheral nerves had no effect, implying that PGE action on this receptor in the CNS elicited the fever. Global deletion of the interleukin-1 receptor type 1 (IL-1R1) also abolished the febrile response, whereas its deletion on neural cells or peripheral nerves had no effect. However, deletion of the IL-1R1 on brain endothelial cells, as well as deletion of the interleukin-6 receptor α on these cells, attenuated the febrile response. In contrast, deletion of the PGE synthesizing enzymes cyclooxygenase-2 and microsomal prostaglandin synthase-1 in brain endothelial cells, known to attenuate fever evoked by systemic inflammation, had no effect. We conclude that fever during localized inflammation is not mediated by neural signaling from the inflamed site, as previously suggested, but is dependent on humoral signaling that involves interleukin actions on brain endothelial cells, probably facilitating PGE entry into the brain from the circulation and hence representing a mechanism distinct from that at work during systemic inflammation.
我们研究了雄性和雌性小鼠在预先形成的气囊中注射酪蛋白引起局部炎症时发热的信号通路。局部炎症导致气囊中 E 族前列腺素(PGE)和细胞因子浓度升高,血浆中这些炎症介质水平升高。脑脊液中 PGE 水平也升高,尽管大脑中几乎没有 PGE 合成的证据。PGE 前列腺素 E 受体 3 (EP) 的全局缺失消除了发热反应,神经细胞中 EP 受体的缺失也是如此,而外周神经中的缺失则没有影响,这表明 PGE 对中枢神经系统中该受体的作用引发了发热。白细胞介素-1 受体类型 1 (IL-1R1) 的全局缺失也消除了发热反应,而其在神经细胞或外周神经中的缺失则没有影响。然而,大脑内皮细胞中 IL-1R1 的缺失以及这些细胞中白细胞介素-6 受体 α 的缺失,减轻了发热反应。相比之下,已知会减弱全身炎症引起的发热的大脑内皮细胞中环氧化酶-2 和微粒体前列腺素合酶-1 等 PGE 合成酶的缺失则没有影响。我们得出结论,局部炎症期间的发热不是由先前提出的炎症部位的神经信号介导的,而是依赖于涉及白细胞介素对大脑内皮细胞作用的体液信号,可能促进 PGE 从循环进入大脑,因此代表了与全身炎症期间不同的机制。