• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节镜下清理术联合一期骨水泥旷置治疗高龄股骨颈骨折:一项前瞻性研究

Synovial Cell Count Before Reimplantation Can Predict the Outcome of Patients with Periprosthetic Knee Infections Undergoing Two-stage Exchange.

机构信息

Service of Infectious Diseases, Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, Italy.

Department of Infectious Diseases, D. Cotugno Hospital, AORN dei Colli - Naples.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Sep 1;479(9):2061-2068. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001788.

DOI:10.1097/CORR.0000000000001788
PMID:33944811
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8373579/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although synovial fluid can be used to diagnose periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) effectively, only the cutoff values adopted at the time of PJI diagnosis have been standardized, and few data are currently available about effectiveness of synovial fluid examination before definitive reimplantation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) What are the most appropriate thresholds for synovial fluid leukocyte counts (WBC) and neutrophil percentage (PMN percentage) in a patient group undergoing definitive reimplantation after an uninterrupted course of antibiotic therapy for chronic PJI? (2) What is the predictive value of our synovial WBC and PMN percentage threshold compared with previously proposed thresholds?

METHODS

In all, 101 patients with PJI were evaluated for inclusion from January 2016 to December 2018. Nineteen percent (19 of 101) of patients were excluded because of the presence of a chronic inflammatory disease, acute/late hematogenous infection, low amount of synovial fluid for laboratory investigations or infection persistence after spacer placement, and adequate antibiotic therapy. Finally, 81% (82 of 101) of patients with a median (range) age of 74 years (48 to 92) undergoing two-stage revision for chronic TKA infection, who were followed up at our institution for a period 96 weeks or more, were included in this study. The patients did not discontinue antibiotic treatment before reimplantation and were treated for 15 days after reimplantation if intraoperative cultures were negative. No patient remained on suppressive treatment after reimplantation. Synovial fluid was aspirated aseptically with a knee spacer in place to evaluate the cell counts before reimplantation. Thirteen percent (11 of 82) of patients had persistent or recurrent infection, defined as continually elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein levels coupled with local signs and symptoms or positive cultures. The synovial fluid WBC counts and PMN percentage from the 11 patients with persistent or recurrent PJI were compared with the 71 patients who were believed to be free of PJI. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses assessed the predictive value of the parameters, and the areas under the curves (AUCs) were evaluated. The sensitivities, specificities, and positive and negative predictive values were determined for the WBC count and PMN percentage. Patients with persistent or recurrent infection had higher median WBC counts (471 cells/µL versus 1344 cells/µL; p < 0.001) and PMN percentage (36% versus 61%; p < 0.001) than did patients believed to be free of PJI.

RESULTS

ROC curve analysis identified the best threshold values to be a WBC count of 934 cells/µL or more (sensitivity 0.82 [95% CI 0.71 to 0.89], specificity 0.82 [95% CI 0.71 to 0.89]) as well as a PMN percentage of at least 52% (sensitivity 0.82 [95% CI 0.71 to 0.89] and specificity 0.78 [95% CI 0.67 to 0.86]. We found no difference between the AUCs for the WBC count and the PMN percentage (0.87 [95% CI 0.79 to 0.96] versus 0.84 [95% CI 0.73 to 0.95]. Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of the synovial fluid WBC count and PMN percentage proposed by other authors, we find that a PMN percentage more than 52% showed better predictive value than previously reported.

CONCLUSION

Based on our findings, we believe that patients with WBC counts of at least 934 and PMN percentage of 52% or more should not undergo reimplantation but rather a repeat debridement, as their risk of persistent or recurrent PJI appears prohibitively high. The accuracy of the proposed cutoffs is better than previously reported.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, diagnostic study.

摘要

背景

尽管滑液可有效用于诊断假体周围关节感染(PJI),但目前仅标准化了 PJI 诊断时采用的截止值,而关于明确再植入前滑液检查的有效性的数据很少。

问题/目的:我们提出了以下问题:(1)在不间断接受抗生素治疗慢性 PJI 后进行明确再植入的患者群体中,滑液白细胞计数(WBC)和中性粒细胞百分比(PMN%)的最佳阈值是什么?(2)与先前提出的阈值相比,我们的滑液 WBC 和 PMN%阈值的预测价值如何?

方法

2016 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月,共评估了 101 例 PJI 患者,其中 19%(19/101)因慢性炎症性疾病、急性/晚期血源性感染、滑液量少或感染在放置间隔器后持续存在、以及抗生素治疗有效而被排除。最终,纳入了 81%(82/101)名年龄中位数(范围)为 74 岁(48-92 岁)的接受二期翻修慢性 TKA 感染的患者,这些患者在我院随访至少 96 周,这些患者在再植入前未停止抗生素治疗,并且在再植入后如果术中培养物为阴性则治疗 15 天。再植入后,没有患者继续接受抑制性治疗。在再植入前,使用膝关节间隔器无菌抽吸滑液,以评估再植入前的细胞计数。13%(11/82)的患者发生持续或复发性感染,定义为持续升高的红细胞沉降率或 C 反应蛋白水平,同时伴有局部体征和症状或阳性培养物。将 11 例持续或复发性 PJI 患者的滑液 WBC 计数和 PMN%与 71 例认为无 PJI 的患者进行比较。接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估了参数的预测价值,并评估了曲线下面积(AUCs)。确定了 WBC 计数和 PMN%的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。与认为无 PJI 的患者相比,持续或复发性感染患者的中位 WBC 计数(471 个/µL 比 1344 个/µL;p<0.001)和 PMN%(36%比 61%;p<0.001)更高。

结果

ROC 曲线分析确定了最佳阈值为 WBC 计数≥934 个/µL(敏感性 0.82 [95%CI 0.71 至 0.89],特异性 0.82 [95%CI 0.71 至 0.89])以及 PMN%≥52%(敏感性 0.82 [95%CI 0.71 至 0.89]和特异性 0.78 [95%CI 0.67 至 0.86]。我们发现 WBC 计数和 PMN%的 AUC 之间没有差异(0.87 [95%CI 0.79 至 0.96] 比 0.84 [95%CI 0.73 至 0.95])。比较其他作者提出的滑液 WBC 计数和 PMN%的敏感性和特异性,我们发现 PMN%超过 52%具有更好的预测价值。

结论

根据我们的发现,我们认为 WBC 计数至少为 934 个/µL 且 PMN%为 52%或更高的患者不应进行再植入,而应再次清创,因为他们发生持续或复发性 PJI 的风险似乎高得令人望而却步。所提出的截止值的准确性优于先前报道。

证据水平

III 级,诊断研究。

相似文献

1
Synovial Cell Count Before Reimplantation Can Predict the Outcome of Patients with Periprosthetic Knee Infections Undergoing Two-stage Exchange.关节镜下清理术联合一期骨水泥旷置治疗高龄股骨颈骨折:一项前瞻性研究
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Sep 1;479(9):2061-2068. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001788.
2
What is the Diagnostic Accuracy of Aspirations Performed on Hips With Antibiotic Cement Spacers?对使用抗生素骨水泥间隔物的髋关节进行穿刺抽吸的诊断准确性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5093-8. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
3
Ideal Timing of Reimplantation in Patients with Periprosthetic Knee Infection Undergoing 2-Stage Exchange: A Diagnostic Scoring System.一期翻修治疗假体周围膝关节感染的理想时机:一种诊断评分系统。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Jun 5;106(11):984-991. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00424. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
4
Utility of Synovial White Blood Cell Count and Differential Before Reimplantation Surgery.再植手术前滑膜白细胞计数及分类的效用
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Sep;32(9):2820-2824. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.03.068. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
5
What Markers Best Guide the Timing of Reimplantation in Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for PJI? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.哪些标志物最能指导二期翻修置换术治疗感染性关节炎的再植入时机?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):1972-1983. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000534680.87622.43.
6
Do serologic and synovial tests help diagnose infection in revision hip arthroplasty with metal-on-metal bearings or corrosion?血清学和滑膜检查有助于诊断金属对金属轴承或腐蚀的髋关节翻修术中的感染吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3902-5.
7
Synovial Cytokines and the MSIS Criteria Are Not Useful for Determining Infection Resolution After Periprosthetic Joint Infection Explantation.滑膜细胞因子和MSIS标准对确定人工关节感染翻修术后感染是否消退并无帮助。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Jul;474(7):1630-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4710-x.
8
What Is the Impact of Automated Synovial Cell Counting on Different Aseptic Causes and Periprosthetic Conditions Associated With Revision THA?自动化滑膜细胞计数对不同无菌原因和与翻修 THA 相关的假体周围状况的影响是什么?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 May 1;480(5):905-914. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002063. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
9
Synovial Fluid Cell Count for Diagnosis of Chronic Periprosthetic Hip Infection.用于诊断慢性人工髋关节周围感染的滑液细胞计数
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 May 3;99(9):753-759. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.00123.
10
Synovial White Blood Cell Count and Differential to Predict Successful Infection Management in a Two-Stage Revision.滑膜白细胞计数及分类以预测两阶段翻修术中感染管理的成功与否
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jun;37(6):1159-1164. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.030. Epub 2022 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of synovial calprotectin and alpha-defensin for the diagnosis of persistent periprosthetic joint infections at second stage of a two-stage revision arthroplasty.在两阶段翻修关节成形术第二阶段中,滑膜钙卫蛋白和α-防御素用于诊断持续性人工关节周围感染的比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 Aug 28;145(1):428. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-06045-x.
2
Identifying potential predictive indicators for reimplantation timing in two-stage revision: a meta-analysis and system review.两阶段翻修术中再植入时机潜在预测指标的识别:一项荟萃分析和系统评价
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 23;145(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05689-5.
3
Upcoming evidence in clinical practice of two-stage revision arthroplasty for prosthetic joint infection.两阶段翻修术治疗人工关节感染的临床实践中即将出现的证据。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 May 18;25(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00767-1.
4
Surgical Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections in Hip and Knee Megaprostheses.髋膝关节大型假体周围感染的外科治疗
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Mar 31;60(4):583. doi: 10.3390/medicina60040583.
5
Risk factors for early septic failure after two-stage exchange total knee arthroplasty for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection.二期翻修治疗假体周围关节感染的全膝关节置换术后早期败血症失败的危险因素。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2024 Feb 12;25(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s10195-024-00750-w.
6
Interval between two-stage exchanges: what is optimal and how do you know?两阶段翻修之间的间隔时间:最佳间隔是多久以及如何确定?
Arthroplasty. 2023 Jul 5;5(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00185-4.
7
Diagnostic Performance of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio, Monocyte to Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio, and Platelet to Mean Platelet Volume Ratio in Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值、单核细胞与淋巴细胞比值、血小板与淋巴细胞比值以及血小板与平均血小板体积比值在人工髋关节和膝关节周围感染中的诊断效能:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 23;12(9):2033. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092033.