Suppr超能文献

七种不同儿科早期预警评分对急诊科发热儿童转入重症监护病房的预测效能:一项回顾性队列研究。

Performance of seven different paediatric early warning scores to predict critical care admission in febrile children presenting to the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Infection, Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 May 4;11(5):e044091. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044091.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Paediatric Early Warning Scores (PEWS) are widely used in the UK, but the heterogeneity across tools and the limited data on their predictive performance represent obstacles to improving best practice. The standardisation of practice through the proposed National PEWS will rely on robust validation. Therefore, we compared the performance of the National PEWS with six other PEWS currently used in NHS hospitals, for their ability to predict critical care (CC) admission in febrile children attending the emergency department (ED).

DESIGN

Retrospective single-centre cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary hospital paediatric ED.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 11 449 eligible febrile ED attendances were identified from the electronic patient record over a 2-year period. Seven PEWS scores were calculated (Alder Hey, Bedside, Bristol, National, Newcastle and Scotland PEWS, and the Paediatric Observation Priority Score, using the worst observations recorded during their ED stay.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome was CC admission within 48 hours, the secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS) >48 hours and sepsis-related mortality.

RESULTS

Of 11 449 febrile children, 134 (1.2%) were admitted to CC within 48 hours of ED presentation, 606 (5.3%) had a hospital LOS >48 hours. 10 (0.09%) children died, 5 (0.04%) were sepsis-related. All seven PEWS demonstrated excellent discrimination for CC admission (range area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) 0.91-0.95) and sepsis-related mortality (range AUC 0.95-0.99), most demonstrated moderate discrimination for hospital LOS (range AUC 0.69-0.75). In CC admission threshold analyses, bedside PEWS (AUC 0.90; 95% CI 0.86 to 0.93) and National PEWS (AUC 0.90; 0.87-0.93) were the most discriminative, both at a threshold of ≥6.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the use of the proposed National PEWS in the paediatric ED for the recognition of suspected sepsis to improve outcomes, but further validation is required in other settings and presentations.

摘要

目的

儿科早期预警评分(PEWS)在英国被广泛应用,但各工具之间存在异质性,且其预测性能的数据有限,这些都成为改善最佳实践的障碍。通过拟议的国家 PEWS 实现实践的标准化将依赖于稳健的验证。因此,我们比较了国家 PEWS 与 NHS 医院目前使用的六种其他 PEWS 在预测发热儿童急诊就诊时需要进入重症监护病房(CC)的能力。

设计

回顾性单中心队列研究。

地点

三级医院儿科急诊。

参与者

在两年期间,从电子病历中总共确定了 11449 名符合条件的发热 ED 就诊者。计算了七种 PEWS 评分(阿德尔海、床边、布里斯托尔、国家、纽卡斯尔和苏格兰 PEWS,以及儿科观察优先级评分),使用在 ED 住院期间记录的最差观察值。

结果

在 11449 名发热儿童中,134 名(1.2%)在 ED 就诊后 48 小时内被收治 CC,606 名(5.3%)的住院时间>48 小时,10 名(0.09%)儿童死亡,5 名(0.04%)与败血症有关。所有七种 PEWS 对 CC 入院(范围接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)0.91-0.95)和败血症相关死亡率(范围 AUC 0.95-0.99)均具有出色的区分能力,大多数对住院 LOS(范围 AUC 0.69-0.75)具有中度区分能力。在 CC 入院阈值分析中,床边 PEWS(AUC 0.90;95%CI 0.86 至 0.93)和国家 PEWS(AUC 0.90;0.87 至 0.93)的区分能力最强,两者的阈值均为≥6。

结论

我们的结果支持在儿科 ED 使用拟议的国家 PEWS 来识别疑似败血症,以改善结局,但需要在其他环境和表现中进一步验证。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Early warning scores in paediatrics: an overview.儿科早期预警评分:概述。
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Apr;104(4):395-399. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-314807. Epub 2018 Nov 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验