Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Australian Genomics Health Alliance, Royal Childrens Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;27(6):1369-1380. doi: 10.1111/jep.13573. Epub 2021 May 5.
RATIONALE, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Teamworking across sociotechnical boundaries in healthcare is growing as technological advances in medicine abound. With this progress, teams need to find new ways of working together in non-traditional settings. The novel field of clinical genomics provides the opportunity to rethink the existing approach to teamworking and how it needs to evolve. Our aim was to identify the key factors influencing teamworking in the emerging field of clinical genomics and how can they be applied in practice.
We drew on three qualitative datasets from interviews undertaken in Australia, 2018/2019, that explored determinants of implementation of clinical genomics with laboratory scientists (n = 7), service and programme leads (n = 21), project officers (n = 2), clinical genetics staff (n = 26) and other medical specialists (n = 21). Data were analysed using a theory-informed matrix approach to identify themes related to teamworking.
We identify that teams in clinical genomics work in an elongated adaptive context where there is rapid evolution of the knowledge base, shifting expectations of staff roles, and fast changes of technology. Delivering care in this setting brings additional challenges to teamworking as members strive to stay abreast of current knowledge and technology. We identify four themes: (a) the role of the team in keeping knowledge up-to-date; (b) professional identity; (c) team adaptability, and (d) practical/organisational considerations.
Challenges to teamworking that arise in the elongated adaptive context do not always fit traditional ways of working, and innovative strategies will need to be adopted to ensure the diagnostic advances of clinical genomics are realised. Provision of time and permission for team members to share knowledge and evolve, promoting capacity building, nurturing trustful relationships and establishing boundaries are amongst the practice recommendations for organisational and team leaders, even though these activities may disrupt existing ways of working or hierarchical structures.
背景、目的和目标:随着医学技术的进步,医疗领域跨社会技术边界的团队合作越来越多。随着这一进步,团队需要在非传统环境中找到新的合作方式。临床基因组学这一新兴领域为重新思考现有的团队合作方式以及如何使其发展提供了机会。我们的目的是确定影响临床基因组学新兴领域团队合作的关键因素,以及如何将这些因素应用于实践。
我们借鉴了 2018/2019 年在澳大利亚进行的三次定性数据集的采访结果,这些采访探讨了实验室科学家(n=7)、服务和项目负责人(n=21)、项目官员(n=2)、临床遗传学工作人员(n=26)和其他医学专家(n=21)实施临床基因组学的决定因素。我们使用一种理论启发的矩阵方法分析数据,以确定与团队合作相关的主题。
我们发现,临床基因组学中的团队在一个拉长的适应环境中工作,在这个环境中,知识库快速发展,员工角色的期望发生变化,技术快速变化。在这种环境下提供护理给团队合作带来了额外的挑战,因为成员们努力跟上当前的知识和技术。我们确定了四个主题:(a)团队在保持知识最新方面的作用;(b)专业身份;(c)团队适应性;(d)实际/组织考虑。
在拉长的适应环境中出现的团队合作挑战并不总是符合传统的工作方式,需要采取创新策略来确保临床基因组学的诊断进展得以实现。为团队成员提供时间和许可来分享知识和发展,促进能力建设,培养信任关系和建立边界是组织和团队领导的实践建议之一,即使这些活动可能会破坏现有的工作方式或等级结构。