Department of Pharmacy Practice, Long Island University, New York, NY, USA.
New York-Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2021 Dec;41(12):1024-1032. doi: 10.1002/phar.2533. Epub 2021 May 27.
Effect of pre-transplant amiodarone use on post-heart transplant (HT) survival is not well established. We therefore sought to examine the effect of amiodarone use on post-HT survival.
We stratified adults who underwent HT between January 2000 and August 2018 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients according to pre-transplant amiodarone use and used recipient and donor characteristics to calculate propensity scores. We then used overlap propensity score weighting to construct Cox proportional hazards regression models (adjusted for Index for Mortality Prediction After Cardiac Transplantation [IMPACT] score and donor/recipient predicted heart mass [PHM] ratio) for mortality outcomes. Logistic regression was used to compare the odds of primary graft failure and drug-treated rejection.
25,394 adult HT recipients were included; median (inter-quartile range) age was 55 (46, 62) years and 75.5% were men. Compared with nonusers, amiodarone users had a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension (46.7% vs. 50.2%; p < 0.0001), left ventricular assist device (LVAD) use (24.5% vs. 31.3%; p < 0.0001), and ventilator support (2.5% vs. 3.6%; p < 0.0001), respectively. The 10-year post-HT mortality rate in the overall population was 32.0%. Amiodarone use was associated with higher post-transplant 30-day (hazard ratio (HR) 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.41) and 1-year mortality (HR 1.13, 1.04-1.22), but similar 5-year (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.07) and 10-year mortality (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98-1.13). Amiodarone use increased primary graft failure risk (odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% CI 1.07-1.57) but decreased drug-treated rejection (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.93).
Although pre-transplant amiodarone was associated with higher short-term mortality, its use did not affect long-term survival. Whether the short-term outcomes are related to greater graft failure risk is unclear.
在心脏移植(HT)后,胺碘酮的使用对生存的影响尚未得到充分证实。因此,我们试图研究胺碘酮的使用对 HT 后生存的影响。
我们根据 HT 前胺碘酮的使用情况,将 2000 年 1 月至 2018 年 8 月期间在移植受者科学注册处登记的成年人进行分层,并使用受者和供者特征计算倾向评分。然后,我们使用重叠倾向评分加权法构建 Cox 比例风险回归模型(根据心脏移植后死亡率预测指数(IMPACT)评分和供体/受者预测心脏质量(PHM)比值进行调整),以评估死亡率结局。使用逻辑回归比较原发性移植物衰竭和药物治疗排斥的几率。
纳入了 25394 名成年 HT 受者;中位(四分位数范围)年龄为 55(46,62)岁,75.5%为男性。与非使用者相比,胺碘酮使用者高血压的患病率显著更高(46.7% vs. 50.2%;p<0.0001)、左心室辅助装置(LVAD)使用率(24.5% vs. 31.3%;p<0.0001)和呼吸机支持率(2.5% vs. 3.6%;p<0.0001)分别更高。整体人群 HT 后 10 年的死亡率为 32.0%。胺碘酮的使用与移植后 30 天(风险比(HR)1.25,95%置信区间(CI)1.11-1.41)和 1 年死亡率(HR 1.13,1.04-1.22)的增加相关,但与 5 年(HR 1.01,95%CI 0.96-1.07)和 10 年(HR 1.05,95%CI 0.98-1.13)死亡率无关。胺碘酮的使用增加了原发性移植物衰竭的风险(比值比(OR)1.30,95%CI 1.07-1.57),但降低了药物治疗排斥的风险(OR 0.81,95%CI 0.70-0.93)。
尽管 HT 前胺碘酮与短期死亡率增加有关,但它的使用并未影响长期生存。短期结局是否与更高的移植物衰竭风险有关尚不清楚。