• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自……的植物的商品风险评估

Commodity risk assessment of plants from .

作者信息

Bragard Claude, Dehnen-Schmutz Katharina, Di Serio Francesco, Gonthier Paolo, Jacques Marie-Agnès, Jaques Miret Josep Anton, Justesen Annemarie Fejer, MacLeod Alan, Magnusson Christer Sven, Milonas Panagiotis, Navas-Cortes Juan A, Parnell Stephen, Reignault Philippe Lucien, Thulke Hans-Hermann, Van der Werf Wopke, Vicent Civera Antonio, Yuen Jonathan, Zappalà Lucia, Chatzivassiliou Elisavet, Debode Jane, Manceau Charles, Gardi Ciro, Mosbach-Schulz Olaf, Potting Roel

出版信息

EFSA J. 2021 May 3;19(5):e06569. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6569. eCollection 2021 May.

DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6569
PMID:33976712
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8091456/
Abstract

The European Commission requested the EFSA Panel on Plant Health to prepare and deliver risk assessments for commodities listed in Commission Implementing Regulation EU/2018/2019 as 'High risk plants, plant products and other objects'. This Scientific Opinion covers plant health risks posed by bare rooted and potted plants of that are imported from Turkey, taking into account the available scientific information, including the technical information provided by the Turkish NPPO. The relevance of any pest for this opinion was based on evidence following defined criteria. One species, the EU non-regulated pest fulfilled all relevant criteria and was selected for further evaluation. For this pest, the risk mitigation measures proposed in the technical dossier from Turkey were evaluated taking into account the possible limiting factors. For this pest, an expert judgement is given on the likelihood of pest freedom taking into consideration the risk mitigation measures acting on the pest, including uncertainties associated with the assessment. The Expert Knowledge Elicitation indicated, with 95% certainty, that between 9,719 and 10,000 plants per 10,000 would be free of .

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局植物健康小组对欧盟委员会实施条例EU/2018/2019中列为“高风险植物、植物产品及其他物品”的商品进行风险评估并提交结果。本科学意见涵盖从土耳其进口的裸根植物和盆栽植物所带来的植物健康风险,同时考虑了现有科学信息,包括土耳其国家植物保护组织提供的技术信息。对于本意见而言,任何有害生物的相关性均基于遵循既定标准的证据。有一个物种,即欧盟未管制的有害生物,满足所有相关标准,因此被选作进一步评估对象。针对这种有害生物,在考虑可能的限制因素的情况下,对土耳其技术档案中提议的风险缓解措施进行了评估。针对这种有害生物,在考虑作用于该有害生物的风险缓解措施(包括与评估相关的不确定性)的情况下,对有害生物不存在的可能性给出了专家判断。专家知识启发法表明,在95%的置信度下,每10,000株植物中有9,719至10,000株将不存在该有害生物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/d15099ae4c2d/EFS2-19-e06569-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/587341038432/EFS2-19-e06569-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/ceaf7e94bbc0/EFS2-19-e06569-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/52f80edd56ae/EFS2-19-e06569-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/acf97267b41a/EFS2-19-e06569-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/d15099ae4c2d/EFS2-19-e06569-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/587341038432/EFS2-19-e06569-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/ceaf7e94bbc0/EFS2-19-e06569-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/52f80edd56ae/EFS2-19-e06569-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/acf97267b41a/EFS2-19-e06569-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4f9/8091456/d15099ae4c2d/EFS2-19-e06569-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of plants from .来自……的植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 May 3;19(5):e06569. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6569. eCollection 2021 May.
2
Commodity risk assessment of plants from .来自……的植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2021 May 4;19(5):e06568. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6568. eCollection 2021 May.
3
Commodity risk assessment of potted plants from Turkey.来自土耳其的盆栽植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 Jun 30;20(6):e07392. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7392. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Commodity risk assessment of specified species of potted plants from .来自……的特定种类盆栽植物的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2022 Jan 18;20(1):e07014. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7014. eCollection 2022 Jan.
5
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Turkey.来自土耳其的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Jun 23;19(6):e06665. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6665. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Commodity risk assessment of grafted plants of from .来自……的嫁接植物的商品风险评估。 (原英文文本表述不完整,from后缺少具体内容)
EFSA J. 2022 Mar 25;20(3):e07201. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7201. eCollection 2022 Mar.
7
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Turkey.来自土耳其的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2022 May 5;20(5):e07301. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7301. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Commodity risk assessment of unrooted cuttings from .来自……的无根插条的商品风险评估
EFSA J. 2022 May 3;20(5):e07300. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7300. eCollection 2022 May.
9
Commodity risk assessment of plants from United Kingdom.来自英国的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2024 Jul 24;22(7):e8893. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8893. eCollection 2024 Jul.
10
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Israel.来自以色列的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):e06353. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6353. eCollection 2021 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
Pest categorisation of .关于……的有害生物分类
EFSA J. 2021 Aug 18;19(8):e06801. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6801. eCollection 2021 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Commodity risk assessment of plants from Israel.来自以色列的植物的商品风险评估。
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 21;19(1):e06353. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6353. eCollection 2021 Jan.
2
Guidance on commodity risk assessment for the evaluation of high risk plants dossiers.用于评估高风险植物档案的商品风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2019 Apr 29;17(4):e05668. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5668. eCollection 2019 Apr.
3
Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment.有害生物定量风险评估指南。
EFSA J. 2018 Aug 3;16(8):e05350. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350. eCollection 2018 Aug.
4
The principles and methods behind EFSA's Guidance on Uncertainty Analysis in Scientific Assessment.欧洲食品安全局科学评估中不确定性分析指南背后的原则和方法。
EFSA J. 2018 Jan 24;16(1):e05122. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5122. eCollection 2018 Jan.