Moezzi Meisam, Shirbandi Kiarash, Shahvandi Hassan Kiani, Arjmand Babak, Rahim Fakher
Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
International Affairs Department (IAD), Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;24:100591. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591. Epub 2021 May 6.
Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched. We used the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool to assess all included studies' quality and potential bias. A hierarchical receiver-operating characteristic summary (HSROC) curve and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve have been implemented. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Finally, 36 studies (a total of 39,246 image data) were selected for inclusion into the final meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for AI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90-0.91), specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90-0.92) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98). For deep learning (DL) method, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90-0.91), specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.88) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97). In case of machine learning (ML), the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90-0.91), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.95) and the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99). AI in COVID-19 patients is useful in identifying symptoms of lung involvement. More prospective real-time trials are required to confirm AI's role for high and quick COVID-19 diagnosis due to the possible selection bias and retrospective existence of currently available studies.
人工智能(AI)系统在支持决策方面已变得至关重要。本系统评价总结了目前所有关于AI辅助CT扫描对COVID-19预测准确性的可用数据。对ISI Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、Science Direct、PROSPERO和EMBASE进行了系统检索。我们使用修订后的诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具来评估所有纳入研究的质量和潜在偏倚。实施了分层受试者工作特征汇总(HSROC)曲线和汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。计算曲线下面积(AUC)以确定诊断准确性。最后,选择36项研究(共39246份图像数据)纳入最终的荟萃分析。AI的合并敏感性为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.91(95%CI,0.90-0.92),AUC为0.96(95%CI,0.91-0.98)。对于深度学习(DL)方法,合并敏感性为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.88(95%CI,0.87-0.88),AUC为0.96(95%CI,0.93-0.97)。在机器学习(ML)的情况下,合并敏感性为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.95(95%CI,0.94-0.95),AUC为0.97(