Suppr超能文献

人工智能辅助CT成像在COVID-19疾病中的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

The diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted CT imaging in COVID-19 disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Moezzi Meisam, Shirbandi Kiarash, Shahvandi Hassan Kiani, Arjmand Babak, Rahim Fakher

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

International Affairs Department (IAD), Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

出版信息

Inform Med Unlocked. 2021;24:100591. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2021.100591. Epub 2021 May 6.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) systems have become critical in support of decision-making. This systematic review summarizes all the data currently available on the AI-assisted CT-Scan prediction accuracy for COVID-19. The ISI Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, Science Direct, PROSPERO, and EMBASE were systematically searched. We used the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool to assess all included studies' quality and potential bias. A hierarchical receiver-operating characteristic summary (HSROC) curve and a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve have been implemented. The area under the curve (AUC) was computed to determine the diagnostic accuracy. Finally, 36 studies (a total of 39,246 image data) were selected for inclusion into the final meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity for AI was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90-0.91), specificity was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90-0.92) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.91-0.98). For deep learning (DL) method, the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90-0.91), specificity was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.87-0.88) and the AUC was 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93-0.97). In case of machine learning (ML), the pooled sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.90-0.91), specificity was 0.95 (95% CI, 0.94-0.95) and the AUC was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99). AI in COVID-19 patients is useful in identifying symptoms of lung involvement. More prospective real-time trials are required to confirm AI's role for high and quick COVID-19 diagnosis due to the possible selection bias and retrospective existence of currently available studies.

摘要

人工智能(AI)系统在支持决策方面已变得至关重要。本系统评价总结了目前所有关于AI辅助CT扫描对COVID-19预测准确性的可用数据。对ISI Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Scopus、CINAHL、Science Direct、PROSPERO和EMBASE进行了系统检索。我们使用修订后的诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具来评估所有纳入研究的质量和潜在偏倚。实施了分层受试者工作特征汇总(HSROC)曲线和汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。计算曲线下面积(AUC)以确定诊断准确性。最后,选择36项研究(共39246份图像数据)纳入最终的荟萃分析。AI的合并敏感性为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.91(95%CI,0.90-0.92),AUC为0.96(95%CI,0.91-0.98)。对于深度学习(DL)方法,合并敏感性为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.88(95%CI,0.87-0.88),AUC为0.96(95%CI,0.93-0.97)。在机器学习(ML)的情况下,合并敏感性为0.90(95%CI,0.90-0.91),特异性为0.95(95%CI,0.94-0.95),AUC为0.97(

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e712/8099790/e8d87a0c9a3c/gr1_lrg.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验