Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, Manchester University Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2021 May 12;25(7):48. doi: 10.1007/s11916-021-00960-5.
Given pharmacological interventions' limited efficacy and abundance of its adverse effects, the repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is considered a viable non-invasive option for managing chronic neuropathic pain of different origins with promising outcomes. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The provision of a systematic review of current literature on rTMS for managing chronic neuropathic pain of different origins, and assess its efficacy and outcomes, highlighting the need for standard protocols for utilizing rTMS. RECENT FINDINGS: Variable stimulation modalities were trialed targeting the M1, DLPFC, and somatosensory cortices S1 and S2. The M1 yielded the best results in 11 of the studies. Frequency of stimulation was variable; however, optimal outcome was with higher frequencies ranging 10-20 Hz rather than low-frequency 1 Hz. Repetitive TMS can produce significant relief from chronic neuropathic pain. The lack of standard methods for rTMS, stimulatory parameters, and target stimulation site precludes concluding the optimal modality for stimulation. The practical algorithm by Lefaucheur and Nguyen (Neurophysiol Clin. 49(4):301-7, 2019) can guide setting standardized algorithms for rTMS. Defining optimal stimulation sites, frequencies, and pulses to maximize patient's pain relief and minimize required rTMS sessions requires further research.
鉴于药物干预的疗效有限且不良反应较多,重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)被认为是一种可行的非侵入性选择,可用于治疗不同来源的慢性神经性疼痛,并取得了有前景的结果。
对 rTMS 治疗不同来源慢性神经性疼痛的现有文献进行系统评价,评估其疗效和结果,强调需要制定利用 rTMS 的标准方案。
尝试了针对 M1、DLPFC 和感觉皮质 S1 和 S2 的不同刺激模式。在 11 项研究中,M1 产生了最好的结果。刺激频率各不相同;然而,高频(10-20 Hz)而非低频(1 Hz)刺激效果最佳。重复经颅磁刺激可显著缓解慢性神经性疼痛。由于 rTMS 的缺乏标准方法、刺激参数和目标刺激部位,无法得出最佳刺激模式的结论。Lefaucheur 和 Nguyen(Neurophysiol Clin. 49(4):301-7, 2019)的实用算法可以指导制定 rTMS 的标准化算法。确定最佳刺激部位、频率和脉冲以最大程度地缓解患者疼痛并最小化所需的 rTMS 疗程需要进一步研究。