Grässler Bernhard, Thielmann Beatrice, Böckelmann Irina, Hökelmann Anita
Department of Sport Science, Faculty of Humanities, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Department of Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Otto von Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Front Physiol. 2021 Apr 23;12:657274. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.657274. eCollection 2021.
Heart rate variability (HRV), the beat-to-beat variation of adjacent heartbeats, is an indicator of the function of the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Increased HRV reflects well-functioning of autonomic control mechanism and cardiovascular health. The aim of this systematic review is to provide a systematic overview of the effects of different physical training modalities on resting HRV and cardiovascular health and risk factors (i.e., baroreflex sensitivity, body fat, body mass, body mass index, blood pressure, heart rate recovery, VO max, and VO peak) in young and middle-aged (mean age of the studies samples up to 44 years), healthy adults. A systematic review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines was performed. Studies investigating the effects of different physical interventions (endurance, resistance, high-intensity, coordinative, or multimodal training) on HRV were included. Trials were considered eligible if the intervention lasted for at least 4 weeks and participants were regarded as general healthy. Five electronic databases were searched from 2005 to September 8th, 2020. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed by two study quality and reporting assessment scales (TESTEX and STARD). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020206606. Of 3,991 retrieved records, 26 were considered eligible and analyzed. Twelve studies used an endurance training (of which three included high-intensity sessions), six studies resistance training, four studies coordinative training, two studies high-intensity training, and two studies used a multimodal intervention. Overall, the results showed for all types of intervention an improvement in linear and non-linear HRV parameters and cardiovascular health and risk factors. However, quality assessment revealed some methodological and reporting deficits. This systematic review highlights the benefits of different types of physical training interventions on autonomic function and health parameters in young and middle-aged, healthy adults. In conclusion, higher training intensities and frequencies are more likely to improve HRV. For future studies, we recommend adhering to the criteria of methodological standards of exercise interventions and HRV measurements and encourage the use of non-linear HRV parameters.
心率变异性(HRV)是相邻心跳之间逐搏的变化,是自主神经系统(ANS)功能的一个指标。HRV增加反映了自主控制机制的良好运作和心血管健康状况。本系统评价的目的是系统综述不同体育锻炼方式对年轻及中年(研究样本的平均年龄最高44岁)健康成年人静息HRV以及心血管健康和风险因素(即压力反射敏感性、体脂、体重、体重指数、血压、心率恢复、最大摄氧量和峰值摄氧量)的影响。按照PRISMA指南进行了系统评价。纳入了研究不同体育干预措施(耐力训练、阻力训练、高强度训练、协调性训练或多模式训练)对HRV影响的研究。如果干预持续至少4周且参与者被视为一般健康,则试验被认为合格。从2005年至2020年9月8日检索了五个电子数据库。通过两个研究质量和报告评估量表(TESTEX和STARD)对合格研究的方法学质量进行评估。PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020206606。在检索到的3991条记录中,26条被认为合格并进行分析。12项研究采用耐力训练(其中3项包括高强度训练环节),6项研究采用阻力训练,4项研究采用协调性训练,2项研究采用高强度训练,2项研究采用多模式干预。总体而言,结果表明,所有类型的干预均使线性和非线性HRV参数以及心血管健康和风险因素得到改善。然而,质量评估发现了一些方法学和报告方面的缺陷。本系统评价强调了不同类型体育锻炼干预措施对年轻及中年健康成年人自主神经功能和健康参数的益处。总之,更高的训练强度和频率更有可能改善HRV。对于未来的研究,我们建议遵循运动干预和HRV测量方法学标准的准则,并鼓励使用非线性HRV参数。