Al-Saleh Yousef, Sabico Shaun, Al-Furqani Ahmed, Jayyousi Amin, Alromaihi Dalal, Ba-Essa Ebtesam, Alawadi Fatheya, Alkaabi Juma, Hassanein Mohamed, Al-Sifri Saud, Saleh Seham, Alessa Thamer, Al-Daghri Nasser M
College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, 22490, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, 11481, Saudi Arabia.
Diabetes Ther. 2021 Aug;12(8):2115-2132. doi: 10.1007/s13300-021-01059-1. Epub 2021 May 13.
Since their inception in the commercial market in the mid-twentieth century, sulfonylureas (SUs) have remained a therapeutic option in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Despite their established glucose-lowering effects, there is no consensus among global experts and modern guidelines regarding the priority of SUs in relation to other therapeutic options, given the lack of evidence that SUs are associated with a low risk of macrovascular events and excess mortality. However, findings from recent trials and real-time observations have resolved this contentious issue somewhat, albeit to varying degrees. The present consensus discusses the role of SUs in contemporary diabetes management in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Regional experts from these countries gathered virtually to formulate a consensus following presentations of topics relevant to SU therapy with an emphasis on gliclazide, including long-term efficacy, cost, end-organ benefits, and side effects, based on up-to-date evidence. The present narrative review reflects the conclusions of this assembly and provides a platform upon which future guidelines for the use of SUs in the GCC can be tailored.
自20世纪中叶在商业市场问世以来,磺脲类药物(SUs)一直是2型糖尿病(T2D)治疗的一种选择。尽管其降糖效果已得到证实,但鉴于缺乏证据表明SUs与低大血管事件风险和额外死亡率相关,全球专家和现代指南对于SUs相对于其他治疗选择的优先地位并未达成共识。然而,近期试验和实时观察的结果在一定程度上解决了这个有争议的问题,尽管程度有所不同。本共识讨论了SUs在海湾合作委员会(GCC)国家当代糖尿病管理中的作用。这些国家的区域专家通过线上方式聚集在一起,在介绍与SU治疗相关的主题(重点是格列齐特)后,根据最新证据形成了共识,这些主题包括长期疗效、成本、终末器官获益和副作用。本叙述性综述反映了本次会议的结论,并提供了一个平台,据此可以定制GCC地区未来使用SUs的指南。