Ramprasath D R, Chezian S Vetrivel, Surendar V
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Chengalpet Medical College Hospital (The TN Dr. MGR Medical University), Chengalpet, Tamil Nadu India.
Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Coimbatore Medical College Hospital (The TN Dr. MGR Medical University), Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641018 India.
Indian J Orthop. 2020 Nov 19;55(3):662-668. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00307-z. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Tibial torsion can be measured by various clinical and radiological methods. Computed tomography (CT) scan measurement is currently the investigation of choice. The purpose of our study was to compare the clinical and CT scan methods to reveal malrotation after nailing of tibia and also to find out if leg position for distal locking has any influence on incidence of malrotation.
We have included 106 patients (21-68 years) of tibia nailing, and categorised them as category A (figure of four position = 54) and category B (knee straight position = 52) based on limb position for distal locking. The plumb line measurement, Thigh Foot Axis (TFA) and CT scan measurement (using new reference line) were documented and compared with the uninjured limb.
We observed plumb line measurement to be the most inaccurate method followed by TFA method. CT scan measurement was the most accurate method showing external rotations (> 10º) in 32 cases (30.1%) and internal rotation (> - 10º) in five cases (4.71%). The TFA method had a sensitivity of 44% and specificity of 86% in identifying malrotations. The interobserver reliability for CT scan measurement was 0.96. Even though statistically not significant ( value), figure of four position for distal locking leads to larger number of malrotations (both external and internal rotation).
CT scan is the most accurate method of measuring malrotation. The new reference line used in our study provides accurate measurement of malrotation. The two different positions of leg for distal locking do not have a statistically significant influence on incidence of malrotation.
胫骨扭转可通过多种临床和放射学方法进行测量。计算机断层扫描(CT)测量目前是首选的检查方法。我们研究的目的是比较临床和CT扫描方法,以揭示胫骨钉固定术后的旋转不良情况,并探究远端锁定时的腿部位置是否对旋转不良的发生率有任何影响。
我们纳入了106例(21 - 68岁)接受胫骨钉固定的患者,并根据远端锁定时的肢体位置将他们分为A组(四字位 = 54例)和B组(膝关节伸直位 = 52例)。记录铅垂线测量、大腿足轴(TFA)和CT扫描测量(使用新的参考线),并与未受伤的肢体进行比较。
我们观察到铅垂线测量是最不准确的方法,其次是TFA方法。CT扫描测量是最准确的方法,显示32例(30.1%)有外旋(>10°),5例(4.71%)有内旋(>-10°)。TFA方法在识别旋转不良方面的敏感性为44%,特异性为86%。CT扫描测量的观察者间可靠性为0.96。尽管在统计学上无显著差异(值),但远端锁定的四字位导致更多的旋转不良(包括外旋和内旋)。
CT扫描是测量旋转不良最准确的方法。我们研究中使用的新参考线可提供准确的旋转不良测量。远端锁定时腿部的两种不同位置对旋转不良的发生率没有统计学上的显著影响。