Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Environ Res. 2021 Aug;199:111325. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111325. Epub 2021 May 14.
There is preliminary evidence that greenery/greenspace around schools may be positively associated with children's cognitive development and academic outcomes, whereas traffic-related air pollution (TRAP) may have a detrimental effect. Few studies have examined pathways between both exposures and academic outcomes. This study aimed to assess associations between greenery, road traffic density (a proxy for TRAP) surrounding primary (elementary) schools, and academic achievement of primary schoolchildren in Melbourne, Australia.
This cross-sectional study examined mean academic scores in Years 3 and 5 for primary schools (n = 851) in Greater Melbourne. Scores were from the 2018 'National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy' (NAPLAN) in five domains: 'Reading'; 'Writing'; 'Spelling'; 'Grammar & Punctuation' and 'Numeracy'. Greenery was measured within school boundaries and surrounding Euclidean buffers (100, 300, 1000 and 2000 m) using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). Measured TRAP proxies were weighted road density (WRD) within the buffers and distance to a major road. Generalised Linear Models were used to examine associations of greenery and TRAP with academic scores (adjusted for school socio-educational status), and to identify mediating pathways.
Greenery was positively associated with Reading scores in Year 3 (all buffers except 2000 m) and in Year 5 (all buffers), with Numeracy in Years 3 and 5 (all buffers) and with Grammar & Punctuation in Year 5 (all buffers). WRD was inversely associated with Reading scores in Year 5 (all buffers), with Numeracy in Year 3 (all buffers) and Year 5 (300 and 1000 m buffers), and with Grammar & Punctuation in Year 3 (100 and 300 m buffers) and Year 5 (all buffers). Distance to a major road was not associated with any score. TRAP partially mediated associations of greenery within 300 m with Numeracy in Year 3 and Grammar & Punctuation in Year 5, and within 2000 m for Reading in Year 5.
Preliminary evidence indicated that greenery around primary schools was positively associated with Reading, Numeracy and Grammar & Punctuation scores, with TRAP mediating some associations. Further research is required to improve TRAP exposure assessment around schools to verify these findings and inform town/school planners and educators regarding optimal school locations and environments for promoting learning.
有初步证据表明,学校周围的绿化/绿地可能与儿童的认知发展和学业成绩呈正相关,而与交通相关的空气污染(TRAP)可能产生不利影响。很少有研究探讨这两种暴露因素与学业成绩之间的途径。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚墨尔本小学周围的绿化、道路交通密度(TRAP 的代表)与小学生学业成绩之间的关联。
本横断面研究调查了大墨尔本地区 851 所小学的小学生在第 3 年和第 5 年的平均学业成绩。成绩来自 2018 年的“国家评估计划-读写和计算能力”(NAPLAN)的五个领域:“阅读”;“写作”;“拼写”;“语法和标点”和“计算”。使用归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)在学校范围内和欧几里得缓冲区(100、300、1000 和 2000 米)内测量绿化。测量的 TRAP 代表物是缓冲区内的加权道路密度(WRD)和与主要道路的距离。广义线性模型用于检验绿化和 TRAP 与学业成绩的关联(调整了学校社会教育地位),并确定中介途径。
绿化与第 3 年的阅读成绩(所有缓冲区,除了 2000 米)和第 5 年的阅读成绩呈正相关(所有缓冲区),与第 3 年和第 5 年的计算成绩呈正相关(所有缓冲区),与第 5 年的语法和标点呈正相关(所有缓冲区)。WRD 与第 5 年的阅读成绩(所有缓冲区)、第 3 年的计算成绩(所有缓冲区)和第 5 年的计算成绩(300 和 1000 米缓冲区)呈负相关,与第 3 年的语法和标点呈负相关(100 和 300 米缓冲区)和第 5 年的语法和标点呈负相关(所有缓冲区)。与主要道路的距离与任何分数都没有关联。TRAP 部分中介了 300 米以内绿化与第 3 年的计算成绩和第 5 年的语法和标点之间的关联,以及 2000 米以内绿化与第 5 年的阅读成绩之间的关联。
初步证据表明,小学周围的绿化与阅读、计算和语法与标点成绩呈正相关,TRAP 中介了一些关联。需要进一步研究以改善学校周围的 TRAP 暴露评估,以验证这些发现,并为城镇/学校规划者和教育工作者提供有关促进学习的最佳学校位置和环境的信息。