Postgraduate School of Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jun 3;7(6):e27189. doi: 10.2196/27189.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, swab tests proved to be effective in containing the infection and served as a means for early diagnosis and contact tracing. However, little evidence exists regarding the correct timing for the execution of the swab test, especially for asymptomatic individuals and health care workers.
The objective of this study was to analyze changes in the positive findings over time in individual SARS-CoV-2 swab tests during a health surveillance program.
The study was conducted with 2071 health care workers at the University Hospital of Verona, with a known date of close contact with a patient with COVID-19, between February 29 and April 17, 2020. The health care workers underwent a health surveillance program with repeated swab tests to track their virological status. A generalized additive mixed model was used to investigate how the probability of a positive test result changes over time since the last known date of close contact, in an overall sample of individuals who tested positive for COVID-19 and in a subset of individuals with an initial negative swab test finding before being proven positive, to assess different surveillance time intervals.
Among the 2071 health care workers in this study, 191 (9.2%) tested positive for COVID-19, and 103 (54%) were asymptomatic with no differences based on sex or age. Among 49 (25.7%) cases, the initial swab test yielded negative findings after close contact with a patient with COVID-19. Sex, age, symptoms, and the time of sampling were not different between individuals with an initial negative swab test finding and those who initially tested positive after close contact. In the overall sample, the estimated probability of testing positive was 0.74 on day 1 after close contact, which increased to 0.77 between days 5 and 8. In the 3 different scenarios for scheduled repeated testing intervals (3, 5, and 7 days) in the subgroup of individuals with an initially negative swab test finding, the probability peaked on the sixth, ninth and tenth, and 13th and 14th days, respectively.
Swab tests can initially yield false-negative outcomes. The probability of testing positive increases from day 1, peaking between days 5 and 8 after close contact with a patient with COVID-19. Early testing, especially in this final time window, is recommended together with a health surveillance program scheduled in close intervals.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,拭子检测被证明在控制感染方面非常有效,并且是早期诊断和接触者追踪的手段。然而,关于拭子检测的正确时间,特别是对于无症状个体和医护人员,几乎没有证据。
本研究的目的是分析在健康监测计划中,个体 SARS-CoV-2 拭子检测的阳性发现随时间的变化。
本研究纳入了 2071 名在维罗纳大学医院工作的医护人员,这些医护人员在 2020 年 2 月 29 日至 4 月 17 日期间与 COVID-19 患者有过密切接触。这些医护人员接受了健康监测计划,进行了多次拭子检测以跟踪他们的病毒学状态。使用广义加性混合模型来研究在整体 COVID-19 阳性个体样本和初始拭子检测阴性但随后转为阳性的个体亚组中,自最后一次已知接触日期以来,阳性检测结果的概率如何随时间变化,以评估不同的监测时间间隔。
在这项研究的 2071 名医护人员中,有 191 人(9.2%)COVID-19 检测呈阳性,其中 103 人(54%)无症状,其性别和年龄无差异。在 49 例(25.7%)病例中,在与 COVID-19 患者密切接触后,初始拭子检测结果为阴性。在初始拭子检测阴性的个体与初始拭子检测阳性但随后转为阳性的个体之间,性别、年龄、症状和采样时间无差异。在整体样本中,接触后第 1 天的阳性检测概率为 0.74,在第 5 至 8 天之间增加到 0.77。在初始拭子检测阴性的个体中,在 3 天、5 天和 7 天的不同重复检测间隔方案的 3 个亚组中,概率分别在第 6、9 和 10 天,第 13 和 14 天达到峰值。
拭子检测最初可能会出现假阴性结果。阳性检测的概率从接触患者的第 1 天开始增加,在接触后第 5 至 8 天达到峰值。建议在 COVID-19 患者密切接触后早期进行检测,特别是在最后这个时间窗口,同时结合定期进行的健康监测计划。