Department of Internal Medicine, Caen University Hospital, Avenue de la Côte de Nacre, 14000, Caen, France.
Normandy University, Unicaen, Caen, France.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2021 May 19;23(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02529-4.
To assess the efficacy and tolerance of tocilizumab (TCZ) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients over 80.
GCA patients over 80 years old from the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis register who received TCZ were analyzed.
Twenty-one GCA patients (median age 84 [81-90] years old, including nine over 85) received TCZ for the following nonexclusive reasons: glucocorticoid (GC)-sparing effect in 14, relapsing disease in 8, disease severity in 4, and/or failure of another immunosuppressant in 4. TCZ was introduced with GCs at diagnosis in 6 patients and at 8 [3-37] months after GC initiation in 15 others. After a median delay of 8 [2-21] months post-TCZ introduction, 14 (67%) patients were able to definitively stop GCs, including 6 who were GC-dependent before TCZ. At the last follow-up (median 20 [3-48] months), 11 (52%) patients had definitively stopped TCZ, and 2 additional patients had stopped but relapsed and resumed TCZ. Seven (33%) patients experienced 11 adverse events: hypercholesterolemia in 4 patients; infections, i.e., pyelonephritis, bronchitis, and fatal septic shock associated with mesenteric infarction following planned surgery (GCs were stopped for 1 year and TCZ infusions for 2 months), respectively, in 3 patients; moderate thrombocytopenia and moderate neutropenia in 2 patients; and a 5-fold increase in transaminase levels in another that improved after TCZ dose reduction.
TCZ remains a valuable GC-sparing option in the oldest GCA patients with an interesting risk-benefit ratio. Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed in one-third of patients.
评估托珠单抗(TCZ)在 80 岁以上巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者中的疗效和耐受性。
分析了来自法国大血管血管炎研究组登记处的 80 岁以上的 GCA 患者,这些患者接受了 TCZ 治疗。
21 例 GCA 患者(中位年龄 84 [81-90] 岁,包括 9 例 85 岁以上)因以下非排他性原因接受 TCZ 治疗:14 例为糖皮质激素(GC)-节省效应,8 例为疾病复发,4 例为疾病严重程度,4 例为另一种免疫抑制剂失败。6 例患者在诊断时即与 GC 一起使用 TCZ,15 例患者在 GC 开始后 8 [3-37] 个月使用 TCZ。在 TCZ 引入后中位 8 [2-21] 个月后,14 例(67%)患者能够明确停止使用 GC,其中 6 例在 TCZ 前依赖 GC。在最后一次随访(中位 20 [3-48] 个月)时,11 例(52%)患者已明确停止 TCZ,另外 2 例患者已停止但复发并重新开始 TCZ。7 例(33%)患者发生 11 例不良事件:4 例患者出现高胆固醇血症;3 例患者分别发生感染,即肾盂肾炎、支气管炎和致命性感染性休克,这与计划手术相关的肠系膜梗死有关(GC 停用 1 年,TCZ 输注 2 个月);2 例患者出现中度血小板减少和中度中性粒细胞减少;另 1 例患者转氨酶水平升高 5 倍,在减少 TCZ 剂量后有所改善。
TCZ 仍然是年龄最大的 GCA 患者中一种有价值的 GC 节省选择,具有有趣的风险效益比。三分之一的患者出现轻度至中度不良事件。