Suppr超能文献

发展阶段 1 姑息治疗后的关怀曲线:5 个中心之间的重症监护比较。

Development of Care Curves Following the Stage 1 Palliation: A Comparison of Intensive Care Among 5 Centers.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology Boston Children's Hospital Boston MA.

Department of Pediatrics Harvard Medical School Boston MA.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun;10(11):e019396. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019396. Epub 2021 May 20.

Abstract

Background Comparison of care among centers is currently limited to major end points, such as mortality, length of stay, or complication rates. Creating "care curves" and comparing individual elements of care over time may highlight modifiable differences in intensive care among centers. Methods and Results We performed an observational retrospective study at 5 centers in the United States to describe key elements of postoperative care following the stage 1 palliation. A consecutive sample of 502 infants undergoing stage 1 palliation between January 2009 and December 2018 were included. All electronic health record entries relating to mandatory mechanical ventilator rate, opioid administration, and fluid intake/outputs between postoperative days (POD) 0 to 28 were extracted from each institution's data warehouse. During the study period, 502 patients underwent stage 1 palliation among the 5 centers. Patients were weaned to a median mandatory mechanical ventilator rate of 10 breaths/minute by POD 4 at Center 5 but not until POD 7 to 8 at Centers 1 and 2. Opioid administration peaked on POD 2 with extreme variance (median 6.9 versus 1.6 mg/kg per day at Center 3 versus Center 2). Daily fluid balance trends were variable: on POD 3 Center 1 had a median fluid balance of -51 mL/kg per day, ranging between -34 to 19 mL/kg per day among remaining centers. Intercenter differences persist after adjusting for patient and surgical characteristics (<0.001 for each end point). Conclusions It is possible to detail and compare individual elements of care over time that represent modifiable differences among centers, which persist even after adjusting for patient factors. Care curves may be used to guide collaborative quality improvement initiatives.

摘要

背景 目前,各中心之间的护理比较仅限于主要终点,如死亡率、住院时间或并发症发生率。创建“护理曲线”并比较随时间推移的护理各个要素,可能会突出中心之间强化护理方面可改变的差异。

方法和结果 我们在美国的 5 个中心进行了一项观察性回顾性研究,以描述 1 期姑息手术后的关键术后护理要素。连续纳入了 2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间接受 1 期姑息手术的 502 例婴儿。从每个机构的数据仓库中提取与术后第 0 至 28 天期间强制性机械通气率、阿片类药物管理和液体出入量相关的所有电子健康记录条目。在研究期间,5 个中心共 502 例患者接受了 1 期姑息手术。5 号中心的患者在术后第 4 天中位数降至 10 次/分钟的强制性机械通气率,但 1 号和 2 号中心要到第 7 至 8 天。阿片类药物的使用在术后第 2 天达到峰值,且差异很大(3 号中心中位数为 6.9mg/kg/天,而 2 号中心中位数为 1.6mg/kg/天)。每日液体平衡趋势各不相同:在术后第 3 天,1 号中心的中位数液体平衡为-51mL/kg/天,其余中心的范围在-34 至 19mL/kg/天之间。即使在调整了患者和手术特征后,各中心之间的差异仍然存在(每个终点均<0.001)。

结论 可以详细比较随时间推移的各个护理要素,这些要素代表了中心之间可改变的差异,即使在调整了患者因素后仍然存在。护理曲线可用于指导协作质量改进计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/530b/8483513/2af3df9a8f76/JAH3-10-e019396-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验