Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain.
Drug Discov Today. 2021 Aug;26(8):2003-2013. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 19.
Biologicals undergo modifications throughout their commercial lifecycle. Major changes can unintentionally magnify their inherent physicochemical variability. Although trials comparing the pre- and the post-change versions have been requested occasionally, analytical comparison is the most sensitive approach to anticipating clinical equivalence. Therefore, it may be concluded, by means of 'extrapolation', that non-identical versions of a given biologic will behave equally in all indications. Despite the lessons learned with original biologics, there are still controversies around the approval of biosimilars through extrapolation. Here, a comprehensive analysis of scattered information allows for an account of cases of original biologic versions approved in some indications with no patient trials involved. Healthcare professionals can be reassured that inasmuch as extrapolation has proven valid for new versions of original biologics, the same holds for biosimilars.
生物制品在其商业生命周期中会经历各种变化。重大变化可能会无意中放大其固有的物理化学变异性。虽然偶尔会要求进行比较预变化和后变化版本的试验,但分析比较是预测临床等效性的最敏感方法。因此,可以通过“外推法”得出结论,即给定生物制品的不同版本在所有适应症中的表现将是相同的。尽管从原始生物制品中吸取了教训,但在通过外推法批准生物类似药方面仍存在争议。在这里,对分散信息的综合分析可以说明在某些适应症中批准的原始生物制品版本的案例,而这些适应症并未涉及患者试验。医疗保健专业人员可以放心,只要外推法已被证明对原始生物制品的新版本有效,那么对于生物类似药也是如此。