Fiori Katherine L, Rauer Amy J, Birditt Kira S, Brown Edna, Orbuch Terri L
Adelphi University.
University of Tennessee Knoxville.
Res Hum Dev. 2021;17(4+):258-273. doi: 10.1080/15427609.2021.1874792. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
In-law relationships can act as sources of both support and stress for couples. Independent of the nature of the actual relationships with in-laws, it may be that couple similarity in perceptions of these ties determines if they undermine or facilitate marital stability. The current study sought to examine how spousal connections to in-laws and concordance about these relationships early in marriage predicted marital stability in a sample of 355 Black and White married couples followed over 16 years. Husbands and wives reported on time spent with families, whose family they turn to for support, and closeness with families during their first year of marriage. Analyses revealed that discordance on these issues early in marriage was common. We found that even after controlling for husband and wife reports of connections with in-laws, discordance on closeness with the wife's family predicted divorce. Thus, when conceptualizing the costs and benefits of connections with in-laws, it is important to consider not only the nature of spouses' ties to each other's families, but the extent to which their views of these ties are concordant.
姻亲关系对于夫妻而言,既可能是支持的来源,也可能带来压力。不论与姻亲实际关系的性质如何,夫妻双方对这些关系认知上的相似性或许决定了它们会破坏还是促进婚姻稳定性。当前的研究试图考察在一个对355对黑人和白人已婚夫妻进行了16年跟踪调查的样本中,婚后初期配偶与姻亲的联系以及对这些关系的一致性看法如何预测婚姻稳定性。丈夫和妻子报告了他们在婚后第一年与家人相处的时间、遇到困难时向谁家寻求支持以及与家人的亲密程度。分析表明,婚后初期在这些问题上存在不一致的情况很常见。我们发现,即使在控制了夫妻双方与姻亲联系的报告之后,与妻子家人亲密程度上的不一致仍预示着离婚。因此,在考量与姻亲关系的成本和收益时,不仅要考虑配偶与对方家庭关系的性质,还要考虑他们对这些关系看法的一致程度,这一点很重要。