Nilsson Eric, Sadler-Riggleman Ingrid, Beck Daniel, Skinner Michael K
Center for Reproductive Biology, School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164-4236, USA.
Environ Epigenet. 2021 May 19;7(1):dvab002. doi: 10.1093/eep/dvab002. eCollection 2021.
Environmental factors such as nutrition, stress, and toxicants can influence epigenetic programming and phenotypes of a wide variety of species from plants to humans. The current study was designed to investigate the impacts of hatchery spawning and rearing on steelhead trout () vs the wild fish on a molecular level. Additionally, epigenetic differences between feeding practices that allow slow growth (2 years) and fast growth (1 year) hatchery trout were investigated. The sperm and red blood cells (RBC) from adult male slow growth/maturation hatchery steelhead, fast growth/maturation hatchery steelhead, and wild (natural-origin) steelhead were collected for DNA preparation to investigate potential alterations in differential DNA methylation regions (DMRs) and genetic mutations, involving copy number variations (CNVs). The sperm and RBC DNA both had a large number of DMRs when comparing the hatchery vs wild steelhead trout populations. The DMRs were cell type specific with negligible overlap. Slow growth/maturation compared to fast growth/maturation steelhead also had a larger number of DMRs in the RBC samples. A number of the DMRs had associated genes that were correlated to various biological processes and pathologies. Observations demonstrate a major epigenetic programming difference between the hatchery and wild natural-origin fish populations, but negligible genetic differences. Therefore, hatchery conditions and growth/maturation rate can alter the epigenetic developmental programming of the steelhead trout. Interestingly, epigenetic alterations in the sperm allow for potential epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of phenotypic variation to future generations. The impacts of hatchery exposures are not only important to consider on the fish exposed, but also on future generations and evolutionary trajectory of fish in the river populations.
营养、压力和有毒物质等环境因素会影响从植物到人类等各种各样物种的表观遗传编程和表型。本研究旨在从分子水平上调查孵化场产卵和养殖对虹鳟鱼()相对于野生鱼的影响。此外,还研究了允许缓慢生长(2年)和快速生长(1年)的孵化场虹鳟鱼在喂养方式上的表观遗传差异。收集成年雄性缓慢生长/成熟的孵化场虹鳟鱼、快速生长/成熟的孵化场虹鳟鱼和野生(天然来源)虹鳟鱼的精子和红细胞(RBC)用于DNA制备,以研究差异DNA甲基化区域(DMR)的潜在变化和基因突变,包括拷贝数变异(CNV)。比较孵化场虹鳟鱼和野生虹鳟鱼种群时,精子和RBC DNA都有大量的DMR。这些DMR具有细胞类型特异性,重叠可忽略不计。与快速生长/成熟的虹鳟鱼相比,缓慢生长/成熟的虹鳟鱼在RBC样本中也有更多的DMR。许多DMR具有与各种生物学过程和病理学相关的基因。观察结果表明孵化场鱼群和野生天然来源鱼群之间存在主要的表观遗传编程差异,但遗传差异可忽略不计。因此,孵化场条件和生长/成熟率可以改变虹鳟鱼的表观遗传发育编程。有趣的是,精子中的表观遗传改变允许表型变异的潜在表观遗传跨代遗传给后代。孵化场暴露的影响不仅要考虑对受暴露鱼类的影响,还要考虑对后代以及河流种群中鱼类进化轨迹的影响。