Suppr超能文献

种植冠支持的下颌可摘局部义齿的临床性能——一项回顾性研究

Clinical Performance of Implant Crown Retained Removable Partial Dentures for Mandibular Edentulism-A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Yoo Soo-Yeon, Kim Seong-Kyun, Heo Seong-Joo, Koak Jai-Young, Jeon Hye-Rin

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, Korea.

Department of Computer Science, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2021 May 18;10(10):2170. doi: 10.3390/jcm10102170.

Abstract

The studies on implant-crown-retained removable partial dentures (IC-RPDs) for edentulism are scarce. The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival rates and marginal bone loss (MBL) of IC-RPDs compared to implant overdentures (IODs) in mandibular edentulism. Variables that influenced survival and marginal bone loss (MBL) of implants in both treatment modalities were analyzed and the functional/esthetic satisfaction of patients as well as prosthetic complications were also observed. Eighteen IC-RPDs with a total of 60 implant-supported survey crowns and 24 IODs with a total 94 implants retained with magnet attachments were observed. After a median observation period of 46.6 months (up to 149 months), we observed 98.3% implant survival rates for IC-RPDs and 92.5% for IODs. Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on the treatment modality showed that, at 96 months, cumulative survival rates were 98.3% in IC-RPD and 83.1% in IOD. For implant survival rates, no statistical differences were observed according to age, sex, opposing dentition, or implant positions ( = 0.515, 0.666, 0.201, 0.749, respectively). The implant MBL measurements for IC-RPD and IOD groups at the final recall check were 0.93 ± 1.22 mm and 2.12 ± 2.09 mm, respectively. Additionally, there were no significant differences between groups ( 0.554). The implants with peri-implantitis at year 1 showed significantly higher MBL at final check-up ( < 0.001). The MBL of implants showed significant differences based on age ( = 0.008) and opposing dentition ( = 0.003). No significant differences of implant MBL were observed for the position of placed implants ( = 0.621) or sex ( = 0.666). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) on functional and esthetic satisfaction were significantly improved after IC-RPD or IOD treatment ( < 0.001). The most frequent prosthetic complication of IC-RPD was clasp loosening, while for IOD group, it was attachment dislodgement. Within the limitations of this retrospective study, we concluded that IC-RPDs could be considered as a viable treatment option for edentulous patients who need few fixed abutments for satisfaction.

摘要

关于用于牙列缺失的种植体-冠固位可摘局部义齿(IC-RPD)的研究很少。本研究的目的是评估在下颌牙列缺失患者中,与种植覆盖义齿(IOD)相比,IC-RPD的生存率和边缘骨丢失(MBL)情况。分析了两种治疗方式中影响种植体生存率和边缘骨丢失的变量,并观察了患者的功能/美学满意度以及修复并发症。观察了18例IC-RPD(共60个种植体支持的覆盖冠)和24例IOD(共94个通过磁性附着体固位的种植体)。在中位观察期46.6个月(最长149个月)后,我们观察到IC-RPD的种植体生存率为98.3%,IOD为92.5%。基于治疗方式的Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,在96个月时,IC-RPD的累积生存率为98.3%,IOD为83.1%。对于种植体生存率,根据年龄、性别、对颌牙列或种植体位置未观察到统计学差异(分别为P = 0.515、0.666、0.201、0.749)。在最后一次复诊检查时,IC-RPD组和IOD组的种植体MBL测量值分别为0.93±1.22mm和2.12±2.09mm。此外,两组之间无显著差异(P = 0.554)。第1年发生种植体周围炎的种植体在最后一次检查时MBL显著更高(P < 0.001)。种植体的MBL根据年龄(P = 0.008)和对颌牙列(P = 0.003)显示出显著差异。对于种植体植入位置(P = 0.621)或性别(P = 0.666),未观察到种植体MBL的显著差异。IC-RPD或IOD治疗后,患者报告的功能和美学满意度的结局指标(PROMs)显著改善(P < 0.001)。IC-RPD最常见的修复并发症是卡环松动,而IOD组是附着体脱位。在本回顾性研究的局限性内,我们得出结论,对于需要少量固定基牙以获得满意效果的无牙患者,IC-RPD可被视为一种可行的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/59a8/8157346/10e7d170d429/jcm-10-02170-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验