Zhang Bei, O'Brien Katherine, Won William, Li Sheng
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
TIRR Disorders of Consciousness Program, TIRR Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Brain Sci. 2021 May 29;11(6):726. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060726.
This is a retrospective study to investigate the results of using zolpidem and lorazepam in persons with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and to provide practical information for clinical application and further studies. The cohort included 146 patients (11 hemorrhagic stroke, 87 traumatic brain injury (TBI), 48 anoxic brain injury (ABI)) admitted to a specialized DoC rehabilitation program. A positive trial indicated a patient responded to either zolpidem or lorazepam with prominent functional improvements necessitating routine use of the medication. Non-responders had equivocal or negative (i.e., went to sleep) responses. Eleven patients with a stroke who had either medication were all non-responders. Of the remaining 135 patients, 95 received at least one medication trial. The overall positive rate was 11.6% (11/95), with 6.3% (5/79) for zolpidem and 14.0% (6/43) for lorazepam. Among TBI patients, the positive rate of the zolpidem trial (10.2%, 5/49) was slightly higher than that of the lorazepam trial (6.9%, 2/29; > 0.05). Among ABI patients, the positive rate of the lorazepam trial (28.6%, 4/14) was significantly higher than that of the zolpidem trial (0%, 0/30; = 0.007). Following a positive trial, most patients were continued on the medications on a regular basis before eventual discontinuation. Our results suggested the etiology of DoC, considering traumatic vs. anoxic injuries, may serve in guiding the clinical application of these medications in the treatment of DoC and in future prospective studies. We advocate for screening all patients with DoC using zolpidem and/or lorazepam.
这是一项回顾性研究,旨在调查使用唑吡坦和劳拉西泮治疗意识障碍(DoC)患者的效果,并为临床应用和进一步研究提供实用信息。该队列包括146例患者(11例出血性中风、87例创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、48例缺氧性脑损伤(ABI)),他们均入住了专门的DoC康复项目。阳性试验表明患者对唑吡坦或劳拉西泮有反应,功能有显著改善,需要常规使用该药物。无反应者的反应不明确或为阴性(即入睡)。11例服用这两种药物之一的中风患者均为无反应者。在其余135例患者中,95例接受了至少一次药物试验。总体阳性率为11.6%(11/95),其中唑吡坦为6.3%(5/79),劳拉西泮为14.0%(6/43)。在TBI患者中,唑吡坦试验的阳性率(10.2%,5/49)略高于劳拉西泮试验(6.9%,2/29;P>0.05)。在ABI患者中,劳拉西泮试验的阳性率(28.6%,4/14)显著高于唑吡坦试验(0%,0/30;P=0.007)。阳性试验后,大多数患者在最终停药前持续定期服用这些药物。我们的结果表明,考虑到创伤性损伤与缺氧性损伤,DoC的病因可能有助于指导这些药物在DoC治疗中的临床应用以及未来的前瞻性研究。我们主张对所有DoC患者使用唑吡坦和/或劳拉西泮进行筛查。