Suppr超能文献

老年人药物治疗与全因和死因死亡率之间的剂量-反应关系。

Dose-Response Relationships Between Polypharmacy and All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Older People.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, UK.

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, UK.

出版信息

J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2022 May 5;77(5):1002-1008. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab155.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although medicines are prescribed based on clinical guidelines and expected to benefit patients, both positive and negative health outcomes have been reported associated with polypharmacy. Mortality is the main outcome, and information on cause-specific mortality is scarce. Hence, we investigated the association between different levels of polypharmacy and all-cause and cause-specific mortality among older adults.

METHOD

The English Longitudinal Study of Ageing is a nationally representative study of people aged 50+. From 2012/2013, 6 295 individuals were followed up to April 2018 for all-cause and cause-specific mortality. Polypharmacy was defined as taking 5-9 long-term medications daily and heightened polypharmacy as 10+ medications. Cox proportional hazards regression and competing-risks regression were used to examine associations between polypharmacy and all-cause and cause-specific mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

Over a 6-year follow-up period, both polypharmacy (19.3%) and heightened polypharmacy (2.4%) were related to all-cause mortality, with hazard ratios of 1.51 (95% CI: 1.05-2.16) and 2.29 (95% CI: 1.40-3.75) respectively, compared with no medications, independently of demographic factors, serious illnesses and long-term conditions, cognitive function, and depression. Polypharmacy and heightened polypharmacy also showed 2.45 (95% CI: 1.13-5.29) and 3.67 (95% CI: 1.43-9.46) times higher risk of cardiovascular disease deaths, respectively. Cancer mortality was only related to heightened polypharmacy.

CONCLUSION

Structured medication reviews are currently advised for heightened polypharmacy, but our results suggest that greater attention to polypharmacy in general for older people may reduce adverse effects and improve older adults' health.

摘要

背景

尽管药物是根据临床指南开具的,预计会使患者受益,但已有报道称,药物的使用与积极和消极的健康结果都有关联。死亡率是主要结局,而关于特定原因死亡率的信息则较为匮乏。因此,我们调查了不同程度的药物使用与老年人全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率之间的关系。

方法

英国老龄化纵向研究是一项针对 50 岁以上人群的全国代表性研究。从 2012/2013 年开始,6295 人被随访至 2018 年 4 月,以记录全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率。药物使用被定义为每天服用 5-9 种长期药物,高度药物使用则定义为每天服用 10 种以上药物。Cox 比例风险回归和竞争风险回归分别用于检查药物使用与全因死亡率和特定原因死亡率之间的关联。

结果

在 6 年的随访期间,药物使用(19.3%)和高度药物使用(2.4%)均与全因死亡率有关,与不使用药物相比,风险比分别为 1.51(95%CI:1.05-2.16)和 2.29(95%CI:1.40-3.75),这与人口统计学因素、严重疾病和长期疾病、认知功能和抑郁无关。药物使用和高度药物使用与心血管疾病死亡的风险也分别增加了 2.45 倍(95%CI:1.13-5.29)和 3.67 倍(95%CI:1.43-9.46)。癌症死亡率仅与高度药物使用有关。

结论

目前建议对高度药物使用进行结构化药物审查,但我们的结果表明,对老年人的一般药物使用给予更多关注可能会降低不良影响并改善老年人的健康。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2ff5/9071388/d2a936a7ad31/glab155_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验