Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA.
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 10;39(23):2539-2551. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.00976. Epub 2021 Jun 6.
Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and residual invasive disease (RD) after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have a high-risk for recurrence, which is reduced by adjuvant capecitabine. Preclinical models support the use of platinum agents in the TNBC basal subtype. The EA1131 trial hypothesized that invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) would not be inferior but improved in patients with basal subtype TNBC treated with adjuvant platinum compared with capecitabine.
Patients with clinical stage II or III TNBC with ≥ 1 cm RD in the breast post-NAC were randomly assigned to receive platinum (carboplatin or cisplatin) once every 3 weeks for four cycles or capecitabine 14 out of 21 days every 3 weeks for six cycles. TNBC subtype (basal nonbasal) was determined by PAM50 in the residual disease. A noninferiority design with superiority alternative was chosen, assuming a 4-year iDFS of 67% with capecitabine.
Four hundred ten of planned 775 participants were randomly assigned to platinum or capecitabine between 2015 and 2021. After median follow-up of 20 months and 120 iDFS events (61% of full information) in the 308 (78%) patients with basal subtype TNBC, the 3-year iDFS for platinum was 42% (95% CI, 30 to 53) versus 49% (95% CI, 39 to 59) for capecitabine. Grade 3 and 4 toxicities were more common with platinum agents. The Data and Safety Monitoring Committee recommended stopping the trial as it was unlikely that further follow-up would show noninferiority or superiority of platinum.
Platinum agents do not improve outcomes in patients with basal subtype TNBC RD post-NAC and are associated with more severe toxicity when compared with capecitabine. Participants had a lower than expected 3-year iDFS regardless of study treatment, highlighting the need for better therapies in this high-risk population.
新辅助化疗(NAC)完成后存在残余浸润性疾病(RD)的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者复发风险较高,辅助卡培他滨可降低这种风险。临床前模型支持在 TNBC 基底亚型中使用铂类药物。EA1131 试验假设,与卡培他滨相比,接受辅助铂类药物治疗的 TNBC 基底亚型患者的无浸润性疾病生存(iDFS)不会降低,反而会提高。
NAC 后乳腺内 RD 大于等于 1cm 的临床 II 期或 III 期 TNBC 患者,随机接受每 3 周一次的铂类(卡铂或顺铂)治疗 4 个周期,或每 3 周 14 天的卡培他滨治疗 6 个周期。TNBC 亚型(基底型 非基底型)通过残余疾病的 PAM50 确定。选择非劣效性设计,假设卡培他滨的 4 年 iDFS 为 67%。
2015 年至 2021 年期间,计划纳入 775 例患者中的 410 例被随机分配至铂类或卡培他滨组。在中位随访 20 个月后,308 例(78%)基底型 TNBC 患者中发生了 120 例 iDFS 事件(完全信息的 61%),铂类的 3 年 iDFS 为 42%(95%CI,30 至 53),卡培他滨为 49%(95%CI,39 至 59)。铂类药物的 3/4 级毒性更为常见。数据和安全监测委员会建议停止试验,因为不太可能显示铂类药物的非劣效性或优越性。
与卡培他滨相比,铂类药物不能改善新辅助化疗后存在基底型 TNBC RD 患者的结局,且与更严重的毒性相关。无论接受何种治疗,患者的 3 年 iDFS 均低于预期,这突出表明该高危人群需要更好的治疗方法。