Kodali V Rajesh Kumar, Kandimalla Anushri, Vakamudi Mahesh
Department of Anesthesiology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Anesthesiology, PSG Institute of Medical Science and Research, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jul-Sep;14(3):478-484. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_77_20. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
Caudal analgesia was a widely practiced regional anesthesia technique in pediatric population. Transversus abdominus plane block (TAP) block has recently emerged as a promising analgesic method in pediatric lower abdominal surgeries.
This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided TAP block and caudal block.
This study was conducted in the department of anesthesiology of a tertiary care teaching hospital.
This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study.
Sixty-two children of American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II undergoing inguinal hernia repair received TAP block at a dose of 0.5 ml.kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (Group A) or caudal block at a dose of 1 ml.kg of 0.25% bupivacaine (Group B) after randomization. The children were analyzed by comparing the post operative pain scores and duration of analgesia. Statistical analysis was done with IBM SPSS software 23 version. Unpaired sample -test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used to compare the means of continuous variables. Fisher's exact test/Chi-square test was used to find the association between categorical variables.
Both groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, weight, and surgery duration. Duration of analgesia was longer in TAP block group compared to that of caudal analgesia (12.93 ± 2.91 h vs. 6.52 ± 1.67 < 0.001). The postoperative pain scores were comparable up to 6 h and at 24 h. Pain scores at 12 h and 18 h were significantly higher in caudal analgesia group compared to that of TAP block group.
Children who received TAP block had prolonged duration of analgesia and lower pain scores compared to those who received caudal analgesia.
骶管镇痛是儿科广泛应用的区域麻醉技术。腹横肌平面阻滞(TAP阻滞)最近已成为小儿下腹部手术中一种有前景的镇痛方法。
本研究旨在比较超声引导下TAP阻滞与骶管阻滞的镇痛效果。
本研究在一家三级护理教学医院的麻醉科进行。
这是一项前瞻性、单盲、随机对照研究。
62例美国麻醉医师协会I级和II级行腹股沟疝修补术的儿童,随机分为两组,A组接受剂量为0.5 ml/kg的0.25%布比卡因TAP阻滞,B组接受剂量为1 ml/kg的0.25%布比卡因骶管阻滞。通过比较术后疼痛评分和镇痛持续时间对儿童进行分析。使用IBM SPSS软件23版进行统计分析。采用非配对样本t检验和曼-惠特尼U检验比较连续变量的均值。使用Fisher精确检验/卡方检验来发现分类变量之间的关联。
两组在年龄、性别、体重和手术持续时间方面具有可比性。TAP阻滞组的镇痛持续时间比骶管镇痛组长(12.93±2.91小时对6.52±1.67小时,P<0.001)。术后6小时和24小时的疼痛评分相当。骶管镇痛组在12小时和18小时的疼痛评分显著高于TAP阻滞组。
与接受骶管镇痛的儿童相比,接受TAP阻滞的儿童镇痛持续时间延长,疼痛评分更低。