MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour, and Development, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
School of Education, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Psychol Res. 2022 Apr;86(3):769-779. doi: 10.1007/s00426-021-01533-2. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
In everyday life, we remember together often. Surprisingly, research reliably shows costs of collaboration. People remember less in groups than the same number of individuals remember separately. However, there is evidence that some groups are more successful than others, depending on factors such as group relationship and verbal communication strategies. To understand further the characteristics of more successful vs. less successful collaborative groups, we examined whether non-verbal eye gaze behaviour was associated with group outcomes. We used eye tracking glasses to measure how much collaborating dyads looked at each other during collaborative recall, and examined whether individual differences in eye- and face-directed gaze were associated with collaborative performance. Increased eye- and face-directed gaze was associated with higher collaborative recall performance, more explicit strategy use, more post-collaborative benefits, and increased memory overlap. However, it was also associated with pre-collaborative recall, indicating that gaze during collaboration may at least partially reflect pre-existing abilities. This research helps elucidate individual differences that underlie the outcomes of collaborative recall, and suggests that non-verbal communication differentiates more vs. less successful collaborative groups.
在日常生活中,我们经常一起回忆。令人惊讶的是,研究可靠地显示出合作的成本。人们在群体中的记忆比相同数量的个体分别记忆的要少。然而,有证据表明,有些群体比其他群体更成功,这取决于群体关系和口头沟通策略等因素。为了进一步了解更成功和不太成功的协作群体的特点,我们研究了非言语的眼神注视行为是否与群体结果有关。我们使用眼动跟踪眼镜来测量在协作回忆期间,协作对的成员彼此之间注视的次数,并检查个体在眼神和面部注视方向上的差异是否与协作表现有关。更多的眼神和面部注视与更高的协作回忆表现、更明确的策略使用、更多的协作后益处以及更高的记忆重叠有关。然而,它也与协作前的回忆有关,这表明协作期间的注视至少部分反映了预先存在的能力。这项研究有助于阐明协作回忆结果背后的个体差异,并表明非言语交流区分了更成功和不太成功的协作群体。