Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Jan;29(1):354-363. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10219-3. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
Many studies show significantly improved survival after R0 resection compared with R1 resection in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC); however, the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACRT) on this association is unknown.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of positive surgical margins (SMs) after NACRT compared with upfront surgery + adjuvant therapy in PAC.
All cases of surgically resected PAC at a single institution were reviewed from 1996 to 2014; patients treated with palliative intent, metastatic disease, and biliary/ampullary tumors were excluded. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).
Overall, 300 patients were included; 134 patients received NACRT with concurrent 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine followed by surgery, and 166 patients received upfront surgery (+ adjuvant chemotherapy in 72% of patients and RT in 65%); 31% of both groups had a positive SM (+SM). The median OS for patients with a +SM or negative SM (-SM) was 26.6 and 31.6 months, respectively for NACRT, and 12.0 and 24.5 months, respectively, for upfront surgery. OS was significantly improved with -SM compared with +SM in both groups (p = 0.006). When resection yielded +SM, NACRT patients had improved OS compared with upfront surgery patients (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, +SM in the upfront surgery group (hazard ratio [HR] 2.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.04-4.24; p < 0.001) and older age (HR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.03, per year; p = 0.007) predicted worse OS. +SM in the NACRT group was not associated with worse OS (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.72-1.65; p = 0.70).
Patients with a positive margin after NACRT and surgery had longer survival compared with patients with a positive margin after upfront surgery. NACRT should be strongly considered for patients at high risk of R1 resections.
许多研究表明,与 1 次性手术加辅助治疗相比,胰腺腺癌(PAC)行 RO 切除术后患者的生存率显著提高;然而,新辅助放化疗(NACRT)对这种关联的影响尚不清楚。
本研究旨在评估与 1 次性手术加辅助治疗相比,NACRT 后行阳性手术切缘(SM)切除术患者的预后意义。
回顾了 1996 年至 2014 年间单中心接受手术治疗的 PAC 所有病例,排除姑息性治疗、转移性疾病和胆道/壶腹肿瘤患者。主要终点是总生存期(OS)。
共纳入 300 例患者;134 例患者接受 NACRT 联合氟尿嘧啶或吉西他滨治疗,然后手术治疗,166 例患者接受 1 次性手术治疗(72%的患者接受辅助化疗和 65%的患者接受放疗);两组患者中均有 31%的患者 SM 为阳性(+SM)。NACRT 组中 SM 阳性(+SM)或阴性(-SM)患者的中位 OS 分别为 26.6 和 31.6 个月,1 次性手术组分别为 12.0 和 24.5 个月。两组中 -SM 患者的 OS 均明显优于 +SM 患者(p=0.006)。当手术切缘阳性时,与 1 次性手术组相比,NACRT 组患者的 OS 有所改善(p<0.001)。多变量分析显示,1 次性手术组中 SM 阳性(HR 2.94,95%置信区间[CI]2.04-4.24;p<0.001)和年龄较大(HR 1.01,95% CI 1.00-1.03,每增加 1 年;p=0.007)是 OS 较差的预测因素。NACRT 组中 SM 阳性与 OS 较差无关(HR 1.09,95% CI 0.72-1.65;p=0.70)。
与 1 次性手术加辅助治疗相比,NACRT 后行阳性手术切缘切除术患者的生存时间较长。对于 R1 切除风险较高的患者,应强烈考虑 NACRT。