Weaver W D, Hill D, Fahrenbruch C E, Copass M K, Martin J S, Cobb L A, Hallstrom A P
Division of Cardiology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98104.
N Engl J Med. 1988 Sep 15;319(11):661-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198809153191101.
The automatic external defibrillator is a simple device that can be used by nonprofessional rescuers to treat cardiac arrest. In 1287 consecutive patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, we assessed the results of initial treatment with this device by firefighters who arrived first at the scene, as compared with the results of standard defibrillation administered by paramedics who arrived slightly after the firefighters. Of 276 patients who were initially treated by firefighters using the automatic defibrillator, 84 (30 percent) survived to hospital discharge (expected rate according to a logistic model, 17 percent; P less than 0.001), as compared with 44 (19 percent) of 228 patients when fire-fighters delivered only basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the first defibrillation was performed after the arrival of the paramedic team. Few patients with conditions other than ventricular fibrillation survived. In a multivariate analysis of characteristics that influenced survival after ventricular fibrillation, a better survival rate was related to a witnessed collapse (odds ratio, 3.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.0 to 7.6), younger age (odds ratio, 1.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 1.4), the presence of "coarse" (higher-amplitude) fibrillation (odds ratio, 4.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.6 to 11.0), a shorter response time for paramedics (odds ratio, 1.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.1), and initial treatment by firefighters using an automatic external defibrillator (odds ratio, 1.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.9). These findings support the widespread use of the automatic external defibrillator as an important part of the treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, although the overall impact of the use of this device on community survival rates is still uncertain.
自动体外除颤器是一种简单的设备,非专业救援人员也可使用它来治疗心脏骤停。在1287例院外心脏骤停患者中,我们评估了最先到达现场的消防员使用该设备进行初始治疗的结果,并与稍晚于消防员到达的护理人员进行标准除颤的结果作比较。在276例最初由消防员使用自动除颤器治疗的患者中,84例(30%)存活至出院(根据逻辑模型的预期存活率为17%;P<0.001),相比之下,在228例患者中,当消防员仅进行基本心肺复苏且在护理人员团队到达后才进行首次除颤时,有44例(19%)存活。除室颤外,其他情况的患者很少存活。在对影响室颤后存活的特征进行多变量分析时,较高的存活率与以下因素相关:目睹心脏骤停(优势比为3.9;95%置信区间为2.0至7.6)、较年轻的年龄(优势比为1.2;95%置信区间为1.0至1.4)、存在“粗”(较高振幅)颤动(优势比为4.2;95%置信区间为1.6至11.0)、护理人员较短的响应时间(优势比为1.4;95%置信区间为1.0至2.1)以及消防员使用自动体外除颤器进行初始治疗(优势比为1.8;95%置信区间为1.1至2.9)。这些发现支持将自动体外除颤器广泛用作院外心脏骤停治疗的重要组成部分,尽管该设备对社区存活率的总体影响仍不确定。