Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Pychological Science, Istituto Europeo d'Oncologia IRCCS, Viale Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 16;21(1):1158. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11168-y.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, between March and May 2020, in Italy, people were asked to shelter in place and most had to put their life on hold, while news of the spread of the virus constantly were broadcasted. The change in habits and the potential exposure to a dangerous virus can be categorized as a catastrophic event, which are usually traumatic and therefore have psychological consequences for the people involved.
Assuming the COVID-19 pandemic as a possible traumatic event, this study aims to explore the contingent behavioural and psychological impact of COVID-19 spread and related lockdown on the Italian general population, through measuring anxiety and post-traumatic stress symptoms .
An ad hoc-survey was set up for the this exploratory research, including the standardized Italian versions of the Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R) and the Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAD-7), and ad hoc items concerning behavioural reactions due to the pandemic spread and related mass quarantine. Participants were recruited across convenient web-based and mobile app channels using a snowball sampling technique. Data was collected from March 25th to May 1st, 2020.
One-thousand one hundred and ninety-five individuals (851 women and 342 men) completed 60% or more of the survey and were considered for analyses. Mean age was 40 years (s.d. = 14.948). Participants resided in 78 Italian provinces (out of 107 territorial divisions), with 25.7% residing in the Milan province and 9.2% from the Monza and Brianza provinces, closest to the epicentre of the Italian outbreak.
During the worst months of the first wave of the Pandemic, the Italian population suffered high level of distress (GAD-7 m = 6.89, s.d. = 5.08; IER-R mean score = 27.86, s.d. 17.46), respectively indicating mild presence of anxiety symptoms, and high levels of PTSD symptoms. Gender seems to be a discriminating variable with women scoring significantly higher than man, both for anxiety symptoms (H (1) = 82.91, p < .001) and all dimensions of PTSD symptoms (intrusion H (1) = 71.23, p < .001, avoidance H (1) = 61.28, p < .001), and hyperarousal (H (1) = 67.348, p < .001). People from Generations Y and Z show to be at higher risk of developing PTSD (V = .746, F (3,1041) =1017.19, p = .001) and GAD symptoms (F (3,1041) = 5.113, p = .002) than older generations.
Gender and generation appeared to be the most consistent risk factor for higher levels of generalized anxiety and PTSD symptoms in the current pandemic. Other variables - such as information seeking behaviours, parental and marriage status, chronic conditions - yielded less consistent evidence. Results indicate the need of including psychological interventions as a standard tool during the emergency management of a catastrophic events such as a pandemic.
在 2020 年 3 月至 5 月的 COVID-19 大流行期间,意大利要求人们就地避难,大多数人不得不搁置生活,而有关病毒传播的消息不断播出。习惯的改变和接触危险病毒的潜在风险可以被归类为灾难性事件,通常是创伤性的,因此会对相关人员产生心理后果。
假设 COVID-19 大流行是一种可能的创伤性事件,本研究旨在通过测量焦虑和创伤后应激症状,探索 COVID-19 传播及其相关封锁对意大利普通民众的偶然行为和心理影响。
本探索性研究设立了一项专门调查,包括经过标准化的意大利版本的事件影响量表修订版(IES-R)和广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7),以及与大流行传播和相关大规模隔离相关的行为反应的专门项目。参与者通过滚雪球抽样技术,在方便的网络和移动应用渠道中招募。数据收集于 2020 年 3 月 25 日至 5 月 1 日。
1195 人(851 名女性和 342 名男性)完成了 60%或更多的调查,被认为可用于分析。平均年龄为 40 岁(标准差=14.948)。参与者居住在意大利的 78 个省(共 107 个行政区),其中 25.7%居住在米兰省,9.2%来自伦巴第大区的蒙扎和布里安扎省,这两个省离意大利疫情爆发的中心最近。
在大流行第一波疫情最严重的几个月里,意大利民众承受着高度的痛苦(GAD-7 m = 6.89,标准差=5.08;IES-R 平均得分为 27.86,标准差=17.46),分别表明存在轻度焦虑症状和高度的创伤后应激症状。性别似乎是一个有区别的变量,女性的得分明显高于男性,焦虑症状(H (1) = 82.91,p <.001)和所有创伤后应激症状维度(闯入 H (1) = 71.23,p <.001,回避 H (1) = 61.28,p <.001)和警觉性增高(H (1) = 67.348,p <.001)。Y 世代和 Z 世代的人出现创伤后应激障碍和广泛性焦虑症状的风险更高(V =.746,F (3,1041) = 1017.19,p =.001)和 GAD 症状(F (3,1041) = 5.113,p =.002)比老一代。
性别和代际似乎是当前大流行中普遍焦虑和创伤后应激症状的最一致的危险因素。其他变量,如信息寻求行为、父母和婚姻状况、慢性疾病,得出的证据不太一致。结果表明,在灾难性事件(如大流行)的紧急管理中,需要将心理干预作为一种标准工具纳入。