Suppr超能文献

不同反馈类型对使用移动问答应用程序学习的影响。

The Effects of Different Feedback Types on Learning With Mobile Quiz Apps.

作者信息

Rüth Marco, Breuer Johannes, Zimmermann Daniel, Kaspar Kai

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Data Archive for the Social Sciences, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 May 31;12:665144. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.665144. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Testing is an effective learning method, and it is the basis of mobile quiz apps. Quiz apps have the potential to facilitate remote and self-regulated learning. In this context, automatized feedback plays a crucial role. In two experimental studies, we examined the effects of two feedback types of quiz apps on performance, namely, the standard corrective feedback of quiz apps and a feedback that incorporates additional information related to the correct response option. We realized a controlled lab setting ( = 68, Study 1) and an unsupervised mobile setting ( = 150, Study 2). In the learning phase, participants used the quiz app and received feedback. They also completed a subsequent test as well as a follow-up test 1 week later by using the same quiz app. Irrespective of feedback type and setting, cognitive outcomes (quiz scores) and metacognitive outcomes (response certainty) increased similarly in the short term and long term. Feedback effects were not moderated by participants' overall response certainty during learning, their prior knowledge, and the difficulty of quiz items. Moreover, we found that participants perceived the quiz app to be similarly attractive, interesting, and enjoyable in both feedback conditions and that they spent slightly more time to process quiz items in the lab setting. We discuss these results in detail, including the role of moderating and mediating factors and prospects for further research and practice. Overall, our results underline that quiz apps are useful and effective tools that can support the acquisition and retention of semantic knowledge in different learning settings.

摘要

测试是一种有效的学习方法,也是移动问答应用程序的基础。问答应用程序有促进远程学习和自主学习的潜力。在这种背景下,自动化反馈起着至关重要的作用。在两项实验研究中,我们考察了问答应用程序的两种反馈类型对学习表现的影响,即问答应用程序的标准纠正性反馈和包含与正确答案选项相关的额外信息的反馈。我们实现了一个受控实验室环境(研究1,n = 68)和一个无监督移动环境(研究2,n = 150)。在学习阶段,参与者使用问答应用程序并接收反馈。他们还在随后完成了一次测试,并在1周后使用相同的问答应用程序进行了一次后续测试。无论反馈类型和环境如何,认知结果(问答分数)和元认知结果(回答确定性)在短期和长期内都有相似的增长。反馈效果不受参与者在学习过程中的总体回答确定性、他们的先验知识以及问答项目难度的调节。此外,我们发现参与者认为问答应用程序在两种反馈条件下同样具有吸引力、趣味性和令人愉悦,并且他们在实验室环境中处理问答项目的时间略长。我们详细讨论了这些结果,包括调节和中介因素的作用以及进一步研究和实践的前景。总体而言,我们的结果强调问答应用程序是有用且有效的工具,可以支持在不同学习环境中语义知识的获取和保留。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d46a/8200521/88f949d9a7cc/fpsyg-12-665144-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验